Search Results

1. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 75 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 75 ACR 253/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 6 April 2023 Heard at: Christchurch/Ōtautaki Appearances: The Appellant in person Mr C Light for t...

2. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 75 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 75 ACR 253/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 6 April 2023 Heard at: Christchurch/Ōtautaki Appearances: The Appellant in person Mr C Light for t...

3. UD v NB Ltd & JB Ltd [2023] NZDT 792 (11 December 2023) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair Page 5 of 5 and preju...

4. LCRO 9/2024 & 12/2024 QB v WF and SY & WF and SY v QB (27 June 2024) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...adversely on the applicant’s professionalism in terms of her lack of diligence, incommunicativeness, discourtesy in correspondence and failure to inform the respondents that she did not have professional indemnity insurance. [41] The applicant appealed that decision to the High Court. She was her own instructing solicitor but was represented by senior counsel. On this occasion, she pleaded that the commencement date of the 90-day period was in early but did so without seeking leave...

5. Pirika v Eru - Te Ngae Farm Trust [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 127 (2013 APPEAL 127) [pdf, 151 KB]

   2013 Māori Appellate Court MB 127 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20120013572 APPEAL 2012/12 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 8 October 2012 at 62 Waiariki MB 92 in respect of Te Ngae Farm Trust BETWEEN ARAMAKARAKA PIRIKA, HIWINUI HEKE, PIRIHIRA FENWICK AND WHARANGI WAETFORD Appellants AND TAI ERU AND RANGIMAHUTA EASTHOPE Respondents H...

6. IACDT - An Adviser's Guide to Proceedings [pdf, 441 KB]

   ...with Tribunal 3 There are specific requirements when filing documents with the Tribunal. Serving Documents on Other Parties 4 There are specific requirements when serving documents on other parties. STEPS IN A SECTION 55 APPEAL Appeal against Decision to Cancel Licence 6 If the Registrar has cancelled your licence under sections 27 and 28 of the Act, you may appeal to the Tribunal. STEPS IN A COMPLAINT HEARING Statement of Complaint 7...

7. Mabruk v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) and Watson (not participating in appeal) [2018] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 215 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 74 READT 045/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BAHA MABRUK Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND AARON WATSON (not participating in the appeal) Second Respondent Hearing: 8 November 2018, at Wellington Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms...

8. [2022] NZACC 20 - Harris v ACC (21 February 2022) [pdf, 177 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 020 ACR 27/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MURRAY HARRIS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 7 December 2021 Heard at: Palmerston North District Court Appearances: Mr Harris in person Mr J Sumner for the respondent Ju...

9. Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2023] NZACC 115 [pdf, 245 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 115 ACR 122/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GAYE STEWART Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 13 July 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant B Marten for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 140 Crown Investment Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 17 MB]

    CROWN INVESTMENTS TRUST v QLDC – TOPIC 31 CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 140 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN CROWN INVESTMENT TRUST (ENV-2019-CHC-66) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Cham...