LCRO 48/2019 VW v EX and TY (3 May 2021) [pdf, 324 KB]
...at [3], [4]. 10 [case citation removed] at [1]–[3], [12]–[14], and [32]–[36]. 4 (1) Act competently [17] Mr VW claimed Ms EX and Mr TY wrongly advised him he could appeal against the High Court’s interim judgment. He said having appealed, the Court of Appeal declined jurisdiction. [18] He also claimed Ms EX and Mr TY did not produce an “important witness” in the High Court proceedings. (2) Fees [19] Mr VW alleged Ms EX, and Mr TY, having wrongly advised th...