Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 211 McKinlay v Wellington Cosmetic Clinic Ltd [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...McKenzie-Bridle, filed a submission in support of an application for costs, which confirmed that Ms McKinlay was legally aided for the purposes of the proceeding. [4] Mr McKenzie-Bridle referred to Curtis v Commonwealth of Australia, where the Court of Appeal considered whether a successful party funded by legal aid could recover scale costs or some lesser amount.3 [5] In that particular context, the Court of Appeal said:4 The quantum [of costs] should be according to the Cour...

2. CO Ltd v GM Ltd [2019] NZDT 1478 (26 July 2019) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

3. XT Ltd v N [2017] NZDT 1458 (6 March 2017) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

4. CG v SG [2019] NZDT 1488 (2 April 2019) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

5. RS v GT Limited [2019] NZDT 1398 (22 May 2019) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

6. KC v BS [2019] NZDT 1399 (17 May 2019) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

7. CCRC-Position-Profile [docx, 45 KB]

   ...publishes a summary of all referral decisions it has made on its website. Key Relationships: · Other Commissioners · Minister of Justice · Minister of Police · Minister of Courts · Attorney General · Chief Justice · President of the Court of Appeal · Chief High Court Judge · Chief District Court Judge · Commission Chief Executive · Commission staff · Iwi and national Māori organisations · Applicants, applicant’s whānau and advocates · Victims and their advocates · Ministry...

8. [2025] NZLVT 10 - Donald v Hastings District Council (19 March 2025) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...equivalent provisions of the HDP providing for the works in that case (both as to roading and stormwater detention). The Council considers that the declarations made by the High Court in Cooper are wrong in law but advises that it was precluded from appealing that decision by the terms of the Agreement for Advance Compensation in place between it and the claimant in that case. The Council also disagrees that the total compensation in this case should be determined as sought by the...

9. Dermot Gregory Nottingham v The Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority [2017] NZREADT 73 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...has been filed and served on Mr Nottingham (on 15 June 2012), and Mr Nottingham has filed and served “preliminary submissions” (undated, but filed on 6 September 2012). [3] Mr Nottingham’s preliminary submissions included a submission that appeal proceedings concerning complaints involving Mr Nottingham and Mr Honey (“the appeals”) should be determined before the application for review was progressed further. In a memorandum dated 2 October 2012, counsel for the Registra...

10. Mercury NZ Limited 94.pdf [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...Wellington Christchurch In the Environment Court of New Zealand at Auckland I mua i te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa I te rohe o Tāmaki Makaurau ENV-2020-AKL-000094 under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 between: Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated Appellant and: Waikato Regional Council Respondent 100423...