Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14606 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZACC 181 — ONeill v ACC (20 September 2022) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ‘NEILLIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 181 ACR 119/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN C O’NEILL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing On the papers Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented B Johns for the Respondent Judgment: 20 Sept...

  2. [2023] NZREADT 27 – Sharma v CAC 1901 & Brake (3 October 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 27 Reference No: READT 049/2019 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN VISHAL and MONISHA SHARMA Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND JULIE ANNE BRAKE and SUCCESS REALTY LTD t/a BAYLEYS ROTORUA Second Respondents Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) C A Sandelin (Deputy Chairperson) G J...

  3. Establishment of Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal 30 January 2018 [pdf, 412 KB]

    ...Cabinet paper therefore recommends authorising you to take any further detailed policy decisions that may arise during the drafting of the Tribunal Bill, in consultation with the Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration. Proposal: Limit first appeals by requiring leave from the High Court (see draft Cabinet paper paragraphs 39 to 42) 14. The 2017 Labour manifesto statement indicated that limited appeal rights from a Tribunal would be preserved. There are several factors to ba...

  4. Hodgson v CAC 10037 & Arnold [2011] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...Chairman J Robson – Member J Gaukrodger – Member Hearing: 29 March 2011 Appearances: Appellant in person Steven Haszard and Nicole Wilde for First Respondent Decision: 6 April 2011 DECISION Introduction [1] This is an appeal by Carol Laurie Hodgson (“the appellant”) against the decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 10037 (“the Committee”) to take no further action under s 89(2)(c) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (“the Act”) in respect of...

  5. Rameka v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2012 APPEAL 167) [pdf, 134 KB]

    RAMEKA V HALL MAC (2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 167) [16 April 2012] IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT (2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 167) (2012 APPEAL 167) A20100012260 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Opepe Farm Trust BETWEEN EMILY RAMEKA AND PUTIPUTI BELL Appellants AND WILLIAM TEMUERA ROBERT HALL Respondent Hearing: 2011 Māori Appellate Court MB 535 dated 8 February 2011...

  6. Young v Accident Compensation Corporation (leave to appeal to High Court) [2022] NZACC 248 [pdf, 201 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 248 ACR 139/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN PAMELA YOUNG Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented J Castle for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 14 Dec...

  7. Reti v Reti-Steel-Hemaima Reti [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 274 (2023 APPEAL 274) [pdf, 363 KB]

    ...it nearly all her Māori land interests. Succession to further interests in 2009 raised an issue about whether or not Te Ruapani was entitled to succeed. This question has divided the whānau ever since. Te Horopaki Background [2] This appeal is from the most recent decision concerning Te Ruapani’s entitlement. On 19 November 2020 Chief Judge Isaac (as he then was) issued a decision on a s 45 application brought by Hemaima’s son Jerry Reti (Jerry). Jerry complained that...

  8. [2021] NZEmpC 98 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...discuss the issue of costs in the first instance.1 If agreement could not be reached, any relevant application was to be filed within 21 days, with responses given 21 days later.2 [3] On 31 May 2021, the plaintiffs filed an application for leave to appeal the Court’s judgment to the Court of Appeal. [4] On 3 June 2021, the day prior to the date when any applications for costs were to be filed, the plaintiffs brought an application for stay of the determination of costs by the C...

  9. IACDT annual report 2022 [pdf, 274 KB]

    ...Tribunal are:2 (1) to make decisions on complaints about immigration advisers; (2) to decide whether an adviser’s licence should be suspended; 1 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 3. 2 Sections 41, 54 & 55. 3 (3) to hear appeals against decisions of the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to cancel the licence of an adviser; and (4) to hear appeals against decisions of the Registrar to reject a complaint. The principal grounds of complaint ar...

  10. July 2016 Criminal Fee Schedules [pdf, 684 KB]

    ...an application made. For example: discharge without conviction under the Sentencing Act; special reason or substitution of community based sentences under the Land Transport Act  any agent fees  reporting to client. (Interlocutory) Appeals to the High Court Appeal against disclosure decision (s33(3)(b) Criminal Disclosure Act 2008) $350 For:  taking instructions, attending the client  receiving and reviewing disclosure  identifying legal and factual issue...