Search Results

1. MD v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 578 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

2. ND v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 689 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

3. ND v BT [2024] NZDT 830 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

4. TL v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 643 (21 November 2024) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

5. [2017] NZSSAA 47 (27 September 2018) [pdf, 259 KB]

   [2017] NZSSAA 47 Reference No. SSA 107/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX, against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at Wellington on 4 December 2017 Appearances G Howell for the Appellant N E Kirkman for Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Developmen...

6. Rahim v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) and Dowdle, Stempa and Eves [2018] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 270 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 65 READT 023/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JENNA RAHIM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First Respondent AND KEITH DOWDLE, JOHN STEMPA, and MAXTON EVES Second Respondents Hearing: 3 October 2018, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C San...

7. [2022] NZACC 80 – Jamieson v ACC (6 May 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 80 ACR 16/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHAEL JAMIESON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 27 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau By AVL Appearances: The appellant was self-represented L Hawes-Gandar and F Becroft fo...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 288 Ngati KoroKoro Hapu v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 500 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 288 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NGĀTI KOROKORO HAPŪ NGĀTI KOROKORO HAPŪ TRUST (ENV-2023-AKL-000220) Appellants AND NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey1 sitting alone under s 279(1)(b) of the Act Last ca...

9. Smith v ACC [2010] NZACA 1 [pdf, 11 KB]

   [2010] NZACA 1 ACA 001/07 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN TOBY SMITH of Wellington Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr P J Cartwright APPEARANCES/COUNSEL No appearance by o...

10. ASC - 2011 annual report [pdf, 337 KB]

    ...5332 3574 3591 3539 2547 2290 2311 1814 1754 1692 725 729 724 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2007 2008 2009 Under 16 16-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40+ E.28 8 LITIGATION: RIGHT TO LIFE INC On 1 June 2011, the Court of Appeal upheld the Committee’s appeal against the 2009 judgment of the High Court on an application for judicial review brought by Right to Life Inc. The High Court had held that the Committee was wrongly interpreting certain of its statut...