14344 items matching your search terms
...31631884:635775 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL-189 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA BETWEEN CABRA RURAL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED & OTHERS RAHOPARA FARMS LIMITED SH16 LIMITED FOREST HABITATS LIMITED RAUHORI FORESTS LIMITED MONOWAI PROPERTIES LIMITED KAREPIRO INVE...
Appeal stream 2010 Transitional Appeals* 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 New Business 291 330 603 518 594 645 555 650 887 Disposals 216 381 522 792 558 805 678 772 On Hand 405 627 623 425 512 262 232 349 New Business...
...grant the application. Although the use of the term “indulgence” is perhaps a little dated, these propositions are amply supported by authority. I note, in particular, the often quoted statement of Richmond J in Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board7: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applicant for a grant of indulgence by...
...and an affidavit from a police constable, which I will refer to when dealing with the submissions. The plaintiff and the defendant also filed full submissions in relation to the application. [14] On 6 May 2010, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal against my judgment issued on 26 March 2010 dealing with the preliminary issue. After convening a telephone conference call, I directed all the current matters before the Court should be placed on hold, awaiti...
...Country Planning Act 1953 to Downer and Co Ltd to commence quarrying of Jaffray Hill to supply approximately 50,000 cubic yards of rock for the construction of a new airport at Momona. Two other consequential declarations were made. [5] SVEL appealed to the High Court. On 25 July 2017 the High Court held that the appeal failed in respect of the first declaration4 . Dunningham J also stated5 [24] The practical effect of the first declaration was to determine that the consent grante...
pMEP – Topic 22 – Consent order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 30 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN TE RŪNANGA O KAIKŌURA TE RŪNANGA O NGĀI TAHU (ENV-2020-CHC-46) (and all other appellants listed at the end of this consent order) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environme...
...MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 158 ACAR 185/23 ACAR 253/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 13 September 2024 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: D Wood for the Appellant K Anderson...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 13 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2016-AKL-000149) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook Environment Comm...
2014 Māori Appellate Court MB 394 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130009145 APPEAL 2013/8 UNDER Section 49, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge made on 9 August 2013 at 2013 Chief Judge's MB 567-594 BETWEEN THE TRUSTEES OF THE TAUWHAO TE NGARE TRUST Appellants AND DONALD SHAW Respondent Hearing:...
...situation of the applicant for joinder purporting to withdraw the application, which, in any event, was opposed by the defendant. However, the defendant seeks costs against Mr Cribb personally. [27] A recent decision of the Court of Appeal, Kidd v Equity Realty (1995) Ltd,6 dealt with the joinder by the Employment Court of a non-party to facilitate the making of costs orders against that party.7 The Court of Appeal referred to s 221 of the Employment Relations Act 2000...