Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 71 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...(Substantive Judgment). 3 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [2022] NZEmpC 128 (Disclosure Judgment). [10] He said that one reason for concluding that an award of costs would not be justified related to the fact that the Court of Appeal may conclude that there had been a mistake in law because the Authority had taken no active part in the judicial review proceeding in this Court.4 He said that a third party was about to file a proceeding in that Court which would hav...

2. [2022] NZACC 60 – Martins v ACC (17 May 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 60 ACR 50/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN EVERLAINE MARTINS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: L Martins for the appellant P McBride for the respondent Judgment: 12 April 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT...

3. Kumar v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2023] NZACC 034 [pdf, 186 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 34 ACR 94/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DHIRENDER KUMAR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 2 March 2023 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented C Sinclair and S Kinsler for...

4. [2023] NZREADT 35 - UM v REAA (CAC 2103) (13 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 35 Reference No: READT 017/2022 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN UM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2103) First Respondent AND NED GOW Second Respondent AND SU Third Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) P N O’Connor (Member) Representation: The...

5. IQ & WK v HK [2024] NZDT 134 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...altercation between the parties about the parking of vehicles in the driveway of the house. I will not reiterate the details of the situation. However, it resulted in HK being convicted and discharged with assault on a family member, which he has appealed. A consequence of the altercation was that HK was bailed away from the house, with restrictions on him accessing the property. Subsequently, from 21 July 2022 he stopped paying his contributions to the mortgage and outgoings for t...

6. Complaints Assessment Committee 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 008 [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...signed a sale and purchase agreement on 2 August, and whether Ms Marr forged, or otherwise knowingly used, a forged sale and purchase agreement dated 2 August 2013. It is therefore relevant to consider judgments of the High Court and Court of Appeal, in which the 2 August agreement was considered. We were referred to the judgments in caveat proceedings issued by Ms Marr, and Keith and Charlotte Marr, in the High Court,2 then appealed by Ms Marr to the Court of Appeal,3 and in bank...

7. December Notification of Applications in Office of Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...the Chief Judge A20200004062 45/93 Thomas Wire Reihana CJ 2020/12 - Hineuia Hauwhenua Ngatara - and a succession order made at 46 Aotea MB 190 on 10 March 1995 - Application to the Chief Judge 16 A20200004983 58/93 John Thornton McLeod Appeal 2020/3 - Harataunga West 2B 2A 1 (Te Paea o Hauraki Maori Reservation) and a decision of the Court made at 198 Waikato- Maniapoto MB 5-34 dated 12 February 2020 - Notice of Appeal A20200005270 45/93 Marama Pohatu CJ 2020/17 - Murimotu 2...

8. KV v TE LCRO 39/12 (15 June 2015) [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...necessary to take any further action on Mr KV’s complaints, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). Background [2] Between 2008 and March 2010 Mr KV instructed Mr TE to represent him in criminal matters and on appeal. Mr KV was convicted and sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment. The appeal was unsuccessful. Mr KV says he expressed dissatisfaction to Mr TE about his conduct of the trial and requested copies of information from his file a...

9. FT v SV [2018] NZDT 1516 (19 December 2018) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

10. ZC v NU Ltd [2018] NZDT 1481 (2 August 2018) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...