Search Results

1. KA v CU Ltd & ZX & GY [2019] NZDT 1501 (18 July 2019) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

2. EU v LX [2019] NZDT 1487 (23 October 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

3. SN v BN Ltd [2017] NZDT 1456 (6 July 2017) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

4. Annual statistics

   ...form below) showing the percentage judgments delivered in the Court for the 12 months ending 31 December of the previous year.  Proceedings Total 1 month or less  3 months or less  6 months or less 6 months or more 2024 Consent Appeals 85 60% 26% 7% 7% Other 140 73% 17% 9% 1% Plan Appeals 134 62.5% 28% 9% .5% Total 359         2023 Consent Appeals 74 51% 26% 9% 12% Other 91 64% 21% 9% 7% Plan Appeals 115 48% 35% 10% 8% Total 280  ...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court

5. Scarborough v Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2015] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...for a non-publication order to be made. [14] The open justice principle is already part of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence on non- publication applications. However, given the principle has recently received significant emphasis in the Court of Appeal it is appropriate the Tribunal’s approach to non- publication orders be updated. The Tribunal’s non-publication jurisdiction to date [15] The Tribunal’s present approach to name suppression is possibly best summarised in Director o...

6. [2011] NZCA 56 CA687/2009 New Zealand Dairy Workers' Union Inc v Open Country Cheese Company Ltd [pdf, 142 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND DAIRY WORKERS' UNION INCORPORATED V OPEN COUNTRY CHEESE COMPANY LIMITED CA687/2009 [9 March 2011] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA687/2009 [2011] NZCA 56 BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND DAIRY WORKERS' UNION INCORPORATED Appellant AND OPEN COUNTRY CHEESE COMPANY LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 16 February 2011 Court: Glazebrook, Randerson and Harrison JJ Counsel: R E Harrison QC and P Cranney for Appellant I R Millard QC and G...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 074 Hanoi Vietnam Cafe v City Rail Link Limited [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 0'74- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of two appeals against a decision on an alteration to designation pursuant to s 174 of the Act HANOI VIETNAM CAFE ("HAVIE") (ENV-2018-AKL-000090) BODY CORPORATE 413692 (ENV-2018-AKL-000091 ) Appellants CITY RAIL Llt\IK LIMITED ("CRLL") Respondent AUCKLAND COUNCIL U...

8. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 556 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000099 AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN BEEF+LAMB NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant A N D WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF PERSON’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Section 274 Resource Management Act 1991...

9. LCRO 176/2021 BR v UE and VJ (7 December 2022) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...Act). [37] On review, the Review Officer quashed the fine and the requirement that Mr Ragg write letters of apology, but upheld the remaining orders. [38] On review, the High Court upheld the decision of the Review Officer. [39] Mr Ragg appealed the High Court decision to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal said: [38] While we can understand the Committee and Review Officer being concerned Mr Ragg had departed from normal conveyancing practices, his conduct was at the...

10. LCDT Annual Report 2024 [pdf, 477 KB]

    ...------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Interim suspension orders ------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Non-publication orders --------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Appeals ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Membership and recruitment --------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Performance standards of members ----...