14944 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 96 READT 017/13 & 018/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MURRAY AND SHARON SHARP Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20006) First Respondent AND GRANT YOUNG Second Respondent AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s. 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MU...
...any right of recovery lay with the beneficiaries. [8] Judge Savage subsequently issued a further direction on 10 December 2015 entering judgment against the Bambers for the sum of $10,687.50.5 [9] Both the decision and subsequent direction were appealed. The first appeal was heard on 17 February 2016. By decision dated 29 June 2016, the Māori Appellate Court allowed the appeal, determining that the trustees have the ability to take proceedings in relation proceeds obtained prior...
[2017] NZSSAA 053 Reference No. SSA 181/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at AUCKLAND on 13 September 2017 Appearances Ms M Wang, agent for the appellant For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Develop...
...review proceedings can only be brought with the leave of the High Court or the Court of Appeal. 27. We understand that the purpose of the new provisions is to remove the incentive to take review proceedings instead of using the normal appeal process. Appeals under the Act are on points of law only so the issues dealt with on appeal and on review are likely to be substantially the same. 28. The Court of Appeal has accepted similar provisions in the Employment Relations Act 2000 are nec...
...personal grievance claim which proceeded to mediation and then to the Employment Relations Authority. [3] The Authority found that Mr WR had been unjustifiably dismissed by his employer ([Company A]) and made awards in favour of Mr WR. [Company A] appealed to the Employment Court which upheld the Authority decision and made 2 further orders, which [Company A] then appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the Employment Court. [4] Invoices re...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 3 ACR 19/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN BARRY JUDKINS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 2 December 2020 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: J Robinson for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment:...
[2020] NZSSAA 6 Reference No. SSA 14/19 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Wellington against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member Hearing at WELLINGTON on 11 March 2020 Appearances The appellant in person R Signal, agent for the Ministry of Soci...
...COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: In Attendance (by: telephone) Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 177 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act FLAX TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-004) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent SPEARGRASS HOLDINGS LIMITED s 274 party Environment Judge J R Jackson (Sitting alone under s 279(1 )(c) o...
...determination).6 (d) Mr AlKazaz then filed a challenge to the reopening determination. The Employment Court judgment dismissing the challenge was dated 22 October 2020 (the reopening judgment).7 (e) Mr AlKazaz filed an application for leave to appeal the reopening judgment in the Court of Appeal. That application was dismissed in a judgment dated 15 February 2021 (the CA judgment).8 [8] Between April 2018 and March 2021 Mr AlKazaz also has been involved in numerous othe...
...the costs of improvements.3 [9] Prior to that decision, in 2018, Mr Walters gave an undertaking not to put Lot 1 on the market or otherwise deal with the title without first providing advance notice to the applicant. [10] The 2020 decision was appealed to the Māori Appellate Court and in part dismissed.4 That decision was then appealed to the Court of Appeal. That appeal was dismissed on 29 March 2022 with the Court of Appeal finding that the Māori Land Court should reconsider...