14944 items matching your search terms
[2016] NZSSAA 102 Reference No. SSA 060/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Australia against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive, upheld b...
[2016] NZSSAA 044 Reference No. SSA 129/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Australia against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review Committee declining the...
...McKenzie-Bridle, filed a submission in support of an application for costs, which confirmed that Ms McKinlay was legally aided for the purposes of the proceeding. [4] Mr McKenzie-Bridle referred to Curtis v Commonwealth of Australia, where the Court of Appeal considered whether a successful party funded by legal aid could recover scale costs or some lesser amount.3 [5] In that particular context, the Court of Appeal said:4 The quantum [of costs] should be according to the Cour...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...publishes a summary of all referral decisions it has made on its website. Key Relationships: · Other Commissioners · Minister of Justice · Minister of Police · Minister of Courts · Attorney General · Chief Justice · President of the Court of Appeal · Chief High Court Judge · Chief District Court Judge · Commission Chief Executive · Commission staff · Iwi and national Māori organisations · Applicants, applicant’s whānau and advocates · Victims and their advocates · Ministry...
...equivalent provisions of the HDP providing for the works in that case (both as to roading and stormwater detention). The Council considers that the declarations made by the High Court in Cooper are wrong in law but advises that it was precluded from appealing that decision by the terms of the Agreement for Advance Compensation in place between it and the claimant in that case. The Council also disagrees that the total compensation in this case should be determined as sought by the...