14938 items matching your search terms
[2010] NZACA 1 ACA 001/07 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN TOBY SMITH of Wellington Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr P J Cartwright APPEARANCES/COUNSEL No appearance by o...
...5332 3574 3591 3539 2547 2290 2311 1814 1754 1692 725 729 724 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2007 2008 2009 Under 16 16-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40+ E.28 8 LITIGATION: RIGHT TO LIFE INC On 1 June 2011, the Court of Appeal upheld the Committee’s appeal against the 2009 judgment of the High Court on an application for judicial review brought by Right to Life Inc. The High Court had held that the Committee was wrongly interpreting certain of its statut...
...Hearing: 15 July 2010 Decision: 21 July 2010 DETERMINATION AS TO SERVICE Adjudicator: P A McConnell Page | 2 INTRODUCTION [1] The second respondent in this claim, DVK Roofing and Waterproofing Co Limited (DVK) lodged an appeal against the Tribunal determination dated 18 March 2010. The first ground of the appeal was that the decision was made in breach of natural justice and contravenes section 27 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990 as the appellant was no...
[2016] NZSSAA 099 Reference No. SSA 075/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Wellington against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 18 October 2016 APPEARANCES Mr G Howell for the appellant Mr R Signal for Chief Executive of the Ministry of Soc...
[2016] NZSSAA 015 Reference No. SSA 149/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Wellington against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 12 February 2016 APPEARANCES Mr G Howell for the appellant Mr R Signal for Chief Executive of the Minist...
QTN PLAN APPEALS – TOPIC 2 – INTERIM DECISION 2.11 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 154 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the...
Jones v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 216 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN J JONES (ENV-2022-AKL-150) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick, sitting alone pursuant to s 279(1) of the Act Date of Order: 28 October 2022 Date of...
GI FINLAY TRUSTEES LIMITED v WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 074 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 325A of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GI FINLAY TRUSTEES LIMITED BETH MARY DANIEL and BARRY CARE DANIEL (ENV-2022-AKL-000189) Appellants AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND PRIORITY TE PUNA INCORPORATED Section 27...
...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 114 ACAR 165/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 8 July 2024 Held at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented I H...
...the party suffering the loss is entitled to claim the damages in the same manner and to the same extent as if the representation were a term of the contract that has been breached. 16. In Overton Holdings Ltd v APN New Zealand Ltd1 the Court of Appeal said that a representation can be implied in the circumstances. However, the courts will be slow to imply in representations where doing so would infringe on the principle of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware). Therefore, the starting...