14929 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 85 READT 12/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN TONY GRINDLE (licensee) Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20004) First respondent AND MARK AND JULIE BRACEY (complainants) Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD at WHANGARE...
BROWNLIE V BROWN MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 271 30 June 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 271 (2011 APPEAL 271) A20100009505 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 2 July 2010 at 7 Tairawhiti MB 39-45 in respect of PIPITUANGI A TRUST BETWEEN THOMAS JOHN BROWNLIE AND MAREE ROSE BROWNLIE Appell...
ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2016] NZACA 01 ACA 06/2015 John Notman Applicant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Applicant: Self represented Counsel for the Respondent: F Becroft Date of Hearing: 15 February 2016 Date of Decision: 3 March 2016 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION _____________________________________________...
...November 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT Copies to: Susan Hughes QC, PO Box 8213, new Plymouth 4342, susan@bankchambers.co.nz 2017 Māori Appellate Court MB 451 Introduction [1] This appeal is against a decision of the lower court, Fisher v Potroz – Mohakatino Parininihi No 1C West 3A21. That decision held that the 1926 sale of Mohakatino Parininihi 1C West 3A2 (the land) from Kereni Wetini to Frederick Waddell was val...
...invalid Annual General Meetings”. [5] The Body Corporate’s claims to the Tribunal were adjourned whilst Ms VB’s application was considered by the Courts, ultimately the Supreme Court, which on [Date] dismissed her application for leave to appeal. [6] On [Date], the Body Corporate filed a memorandum with the Tribunal to update the Body Corporate’s claim against the owners and requested an evaluation conference. The amended claim filed included further levies that had fallen...
...disposed 4 Comparison table of cases filed and cases disposed 4 Comparison table showing type of person charged 5 Case progress 5 Number of hearings by location 6 Decisions 6 Penalty orders 7 Other outcomes / Orders made 7 Suppression 7 Appeals 8 Cost recovery 8 Membership and Recruitment 8 Member update 9 Performance Standards of Members 9 Administration 9 Determinations 10 Performance of the Act 11 Looking ahead 11 Appendix 1 - Membership during the perio...
...Background [2] Mr BT was assisting Mr LF, who had been convicted of rape. Mr LF died in 2009 and Mr BT is pursuing a posthumous pardon for him. [3] Mr BT says that on 10 July 2013 he sought advice from Dr DG as to whether or not the Court of Appeal had followed the principles established in two decisions where Dr DG had appeared for the convicted parties. 2 [4] Dr DG responded: BT Further to my fax having read the materials supplied and our 40 mins telephone conversation...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 115 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to section 120 of the Act FLAX TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-004) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson (Sitting alone under section 279(1 )(c) of the Act) Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch (Final memorandum received 23 July...
...(Substantive Judgment). 3 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [2022] NZEmpC 128 (Disclosure Judgment). [10] He said that one reason for concluding that an award of costs would not be justified related to the fact that the Court of Appeal may conclude that there had been a mistake in law because the Authority had taken no active part in the judicial review proceeding in this Court.4 He said that a third party was about to file a proceeding in that Court which would hav...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 60 ACR 50/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN EVERLAINE MARTINS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: L Martins for the appellant P McBride for the respondent Judgment: 12 April 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT...