14606 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 111 ACR 223/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN IVAN STRYDER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Heard at: Dunedin/Otepoti Appearances: Mr P Sara for the appellant Mr I Hunt for the respondent Judgment: 21...
...charged with the murders of Mr Smart and Ms Hope. On 11 September 1999 Mr Watson was found guilty of their murders, and was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 17 years. Following his convictions, Mr Watson appealed to the Court of Appeal. His appeal was unsuccessful, as was his subsequent application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council. 5. In November 2008, Mr Watson applied for exercise of the Royal prerogative of mercy. In his appl...
...new issues they raised in that submission. Specifically, on 1 September 201 1 the Ministry wrote to Mr Watson's legal team and asked them to provide information or evidence to support the submissions that: 1. A referral to the Court of Appeal is warranted on the ground that 'the verdicts were unreasonable and could not be supported having regard to the evidence'. 11. There were a number of identification procedures undergone by Mr Guy Wallace and Ms Roz McNeilly...
The Customs Appeal Authority hears appeals against the decisions or directions of the New Zealand Customs Service. The Authority holds hearings throughout New Zealand. About the Authority The Customs Appeal Authority is an independent judicial body that hears appeals against the decisions and directions of the New Zealand Customs Service. Apply to the Customs Appeal Authority You need to appeal within 20 working days of the date you received the Customs decision or direction. What ha...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 20 READT 075/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DELAWER HOOSAIN KUMANDAN Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 404) Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr G Denley – Member Ms N Dangen – Member HEARD ON THE PAPERS APPEARANCES The appellant on his own behalf Mr J Simpson, co...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 11 READT 021 and 022/19 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BRUCE RAYMOND CATLEY and TIMOTHY JOHN BOYLE Appellants/Applicants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 521) First Respondent AND MARGARET and ROBERT FLANAGAN Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson)...
Guidance on using the notice of cross-appeal template About the notice of cross-appeal [bookmark: Purpose]To make an appeal to the District Court, where another party to the decision has already filed a notice of appeal, a notice of cross-appeal must be filed. How to use the template All the required fields are set out in the template on the following two pages. The sections that you have to fill out are marked with red text. The red text explains what you need to put in. These are fillable for...
2023 Māori Appellate Court MB 206 Tana v Gilbert - Pukahakaha East 5B4 [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 206 (2023 APPEAL 206) I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District AP-20230000021505 A20230009123 A20220011759 A20220004045 WĀHANGA Under Sections 58 and 231 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Pukahakaha East 5B4 and Others I WAENGA I...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 71 ACR 175/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 149 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN NESHIA HOLDAWAY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The Appellant in person Mr L Hawes-Gandar for the Respondent Judgment: 10 May 2023 _...
...best that can be achieved would be a reasonable estimate of the value of food and accommodation and agreed that the Appeal Authority’s estimate of $100.00 a week (supported by Counsel for Mr Langdon at the time) is reasonable. [24] Mr Langdon appealed the Appeal Authority’s decision to the High Court with respect to other allowances, namely: [a] Training and associated costs. [b] Use of a company vehicle. [c] Motorcycle storage. [d] Laundry expenses. [25] The parties agree...