14372 items matching your search terms
...ENV-‐2017-‐AKL-‐000155 IN THE MATTER of Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 and the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156(3) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan H...
POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST v HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 250 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2022-AKL-000010) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Applicant and s274 party Court: Environment Jud...
Maori Appellate Court MB 105 IN THE MÄORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20120007050 APPEAL 2012/4 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Mäori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by Hōhepa Mei Tatere and Te Aroha Edwards, against orders of the Mäori Land Court issued on 4 April 2012 at 15 Täkitimu MB 204-221 in respect of Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C, Tamaki 2A2A (Balance) also known as Ngawapurua and Rua Roa Trusts BETWEEN HOHEPA MEI TATER...
NGUNGURU COASTAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED MAC 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 80 [1 March 2012] IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 80 (2012 APPEAL 80) A20110007940 A20110008078 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF appeals against a decision of the Maori Land Court made on 15 June 2011 at 22 Taitokerau MB 209-228 in respect of HORAHORA 1B4A2D1, HORAHORA 1B3, HORAHORA 1B4B4 and H...
...of section 280 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 did not give the trial Judge jurisdiction to exercise powers under section 280(7) without first giving notice of and holding a new hearing (2) Natural justice It is submitted that in making the orders appealed against the trial Judge failed to comply with the principles of natural justice in failing to separate his investigative and judicial functions. (3) Evidence - It is submitted that the trial Judge had no evidence before him that would just...
...MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC <J 2 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGTPA) the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal in relation to the Auckland Proposed Unitary Plan WALLACE GROUP LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-241 ) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment Commissio...
...Application to the Chief Judge 18 A20200004823 45/93 Anna Anderson Wahapo Tipene - against a succession order at 5 KH (s) 197 -201 dated 31 October 2005 (31 October 2005 - Application to the Chief Judge A20200004983 58/93 John Thornton McLeod Appeal 2020/3 - Harataunga West 2B 2A 1 (Te Paea o Hauraki Maori Reservation) and a decision of the Court made at 198 Waikato- Maniapoto MB 5-34 dated 12 February 2020 - Notice of Appeal A20200005270 45/93 Marama Pohatu CJ 2020/17 - Mur...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA INTHEMATIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019) NZEnvC 30 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 325 of the Act ZINDIA LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-178) Appellant MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Blenheim on 17 December 2018 Appearances: Q A M Davies for the appellant A C Besier and K E Mitc...
...COURT IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV-2016- of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act (2010) ("the Act") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under s156(3) of the Act of Hearing Topics 22 (Natural Hazards and Flooding) and 65 (Definitions) MAN O'WAR FARM LIMITED Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL AGAINST DECISIONS ON PROPOSED PLAN Dated 31...
...considered by the [City] Standards Committee [X] (CSCX). 3 [13] CSCX delivered its decision on 20 March 2014. The Committee determined to take no further action on the complaint, as it considered that Mr KB had an adequate remedy or right of appeal that would be reasonable for him to exercise. [14] In July 2017, Q Law merged its practice with [Law firm A]. Mr WQ continued as a director. Mr LT ceased being a director in December 2016. Mr WQ is now retired from practice. T...