14377 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 69 ACR 91/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN J COAKLEY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 20 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: M Williams for the appellant K Feltham for the respondent Judgment: 28 April...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 133 ACR 144/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DAVID THOMSON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 8 July 2022 Held at: New Plymouth/Ngāmotu Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented J Sumner for the respondent Judgment: 13 July...
...situation was less clear where the contract did not expressly state that interest would apply at the contract rate after any judgment, but used some other less specific wording. 25. In Nottingham v Registered Securities Ltd (in liq) the Court of Appeal declined to award interest at the higher contractual rate post-judgment, noting that “Contractual rights are one thing. The sanction of a Court order for future interest is another”6. 3 Nottingham v Registered Securities Ltd (in...
...must also consider the term induced. The question of whether a party has been induced to enter into a contract by a misrepresentation for the purposes of the act, where the seller did not intend to induce the contract, was resolved by the Court of Appeal in Savill v NZI Finance Ltd [1990] 3 NZLR 135; (1989) 3 TCLR 673 (CA): The Court held that the section did not change the common law rule that it is not enough for a party to say that a representation caused that party to act in a particu...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 185 ACAR 239/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN WARREN JOHN DAVIES Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 5 November 2024 Heard at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara Appearances: J Rees for the Appellant CE Sinclair and S Kinster for the Respon...
...this decision and considered the application as being for SLPO. The application was declined because Ms XXXX had no 2 working age residence in New Zealand. This decision was upheld by a Benefits Review Committee. [4] Ms XXXX now appeals the decision of the Chief Executive not to grant her application for a SLPO under the Social Welfare (Reciprocity with Australia) Order 2002 (the Order) which gives effect to the Agreement on Social Security between the Government of New...
...appeal the Council's decision under section 156(1) of the LGATPA because the Council rejected a recommendation ofthe Hearings Panel in relation to matters addressed in Radiata's submission (3346) on the proposed plan. 3. Radiata is appealing the Council's rejection ofthe Hearing Panel's recommendations. 2 4. Radiata made a submission (No. 3346) in relation to the subdivision rules for rural zones seeking the reinstatement of the environmental enhancement su...
...After hearing further from the parties, including Mr Bell, Allan J found that the plaintiffs received indefeasible title. The beneficial owners 12 Warin v Registrar-General of Land (2008) 10 NZCPR 73. 222 Taitokerau MB 249 sought to appeal. The Court of Appeal struck out the appeal for want of jurisdiction, finding that:13 (a) The beneficial owners were not a party to the proceeding in the High Court. (b) The only defendants in the High Court were the Registrar-Gen...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision [2022] NZEnvC O C\ 0 an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 CABLE BAY WINES LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000010) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent an application under s 316 the Resource Management Act 1991 AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2018-AKL-000017) Applicant CABLE BAY WINES LIMITED &...
IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2021] NZIACDT 22 Reference No: IACDT 08/21 IN THE MATTER of an appeal against a decision of the Registrar under s 54 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY TC Appellant AND THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 3 September 2021 REPRESENTATION: Appellant: Self-...