Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 14 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Steelfort Engineering Co Ltd [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...all discretions, it must be exercised in a considered and particularised manner in accordance with established principles. The key principles applicable to the Court‟s discretion are now well established. They were enunciated by the Court of Appeal in Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee 2 , Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd 3 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly. 4 [5] In Elmsly, William Young J delivering the judgment of the Court, stated: [42] As good a starting point as...

2. [2008] NZEmpC AC 18/08 Nelson v Fletcher Steel Ltd [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...does not require leave to challenge it. [3] I should say something first about the tests applicable to an application such as this. Initially both counsel appeared to rely on the line of cases and the tests set out in them where applications to appeal or to challenge out of time are made. When I suggested that this might not be the appropriate analogy, not surprisingly Mr Nicholson retreated from that line somewhat but Mr Blake maintained that the tests were essentially the same....

3. [2015] NZSSAA 033, 12 May [pdf, 45 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 033 Reference No. SSA 161/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 13 April 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr G Moore for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of So...

4. [2015] NZSSAA 24 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 36 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 024 Reference No. SSA 144/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 10 March 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr B Moodley for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social...

5. [2015] NZSSAA 59 (21 August 2015) [pdf, 32 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 059 Reference No. SSA 024/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 10 August 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr B Moodley for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Develop...

6. [2016] NZSSAA 098 (21 November 2016) [pdf, 104 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 098 Reference No. SSA 094/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Lower Hutt against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 17 October 2016 APPEARANCES The appellant in person J Hume for Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Deve...

7. [2016] NZSSAA 016 (11 March 2016) [pdf, 48 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 016 Reference No. SSA 166/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Christchurch against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON by telephone conference call on 11 September 2015 and on the papers APPEARANCES The appellant in person...

8. IQ v SG LCRO 56 / 2011 (2 March 2012) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...$2,039.29 including GST and disbursements. A third invoice for $24,618.72 covered attendances and legal work from 1 August 2008 up to and including the successful defence of the claim against the Applicant. [5] In April 2009 the former son in law appealed the Family Court decision to the High Court. The appeal was defended by both the Applicant and her daughter. When the matter was called for hearing on 10 November 2009 it was adjourned until the next day for reasons relating...

9. SG v H Ltd [2020] NZDT 1327 (29 October 2020) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

10. Hamilton City Council.pdf [pdf, 296 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000101 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN AUCKLAND/WAIKATO AND EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCILS Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Responden...