Search Results

1. OH v T Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 570 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

2. GI v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 452 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

3. UC v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 426 (17 June 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

4. CI v KH Ltd [2024] NZDT 486 (18 June 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

5. Q Ltd v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 883 (18 December 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

6. TD & LP v KK & F Ltd [2024] NZDT 688 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

7. BN & EN v Z Ltd [2025] NZDT 76 (4 March 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

8. [2024] NZSSAA 04 (13 March 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ..._____________________________________________________________ Representatives: Mr Brodie, agent for XXXX Ministry of Social Development for the Chief Executive [2024] NZSSAA 04 Reference no: NZSSAA 52/22 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an Appeal by XXXX of Vietnam against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 079 Guthrie v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...Commissioner’s decision 57 I Evaluation 57 Plan integrity 61 Part 2 62 J Conclusion 63 Annexures A Summary of Operative Plan and Proposed Plan issues, objectives, policies and assessment matters 64 4 B Status of proposed plan appeals 71 C Landscape Character Units 72 D Landscape agreed extent of receiving environment 76 5 REASONS A Appeal and Proposal This appeal concerns a proposed 14-lot subdivision located in the rural area adjacent to the...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 127 South Canterbury District Health Board v Sanderson [pdf, 709 KB]

    ...say the Authority reached a correct conclusion. [5] It is worth referring to the applicable legal principles at the outset. The AT’s circumstances must be assessed in light of the so-called sleepover principles, as confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Idea Services v Dickson.2 In explaining the appropriate approach, the Court said it is helpful to consider the following three factors when making the necessary assessment:3 a) the constraints placed on the freedom the employee...