14610 items matching your search terms
[2019] NZSSAA 3 Reference No. SSA 18/18 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member C Joe - Member Hearing at Auckland on 16 January 2019 Appearances No appearance for the appellant A Katona for the Ministry of Soci...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 206 ACR 7/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT PURSUANT TO SECTION 162 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN ANGELINA RAPATINI Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The applicant in person Ms F Becro...
Hiestand v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 113 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an abatement notice under s 325 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MAURICE HIESTAND (ENV-2024-AKL-000050) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge SM Tepania Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 10 May 2024 Date of Decision: 16 May 2024 D...
Ratcliffe Family Trust v Hamilton City Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 210 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an abatement notice under section 325 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RATCLIFFE FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2024-AKL-026) Appellant AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania Hearing: Via Judicial Teleconference Last case event:...
On this page: Costs Enforcement Appeals Application for rehearing All judges aim to deliver their judgments as quickly as possible. The judges of the Employment Court expect that 90% of judgments will be delivered within three months of the last day of the hearing or receipt of the last submissions, whichever is later. The three month period does not include court vacations or other periods of judges’ leave. A judge may sometimes tell the parties at the hearing that th...
...whether diffuse nitrogen discharge limits imposed by way of resource consent conditions will be recalculated when the model (eg, Overseer) used to assess compliance with those limits is updated. Specific grounds of appeal and provisions appealed 9. Specific grounds of appeal, and the provisions appealed, are described in Schedule 1. Relief sought 10. Fonterra respectfully requests: (a) That the provisions of PC 1 be amended as set out in Schedule 1 or by words t...
ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2015] NZACA 3 ACA 017/2013 Michael Adams Applicant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Applicant: Self-represented Counsel for the Respondent: P A McBride Date of Decision: __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1]...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 108 ACAR 179/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KELLIE LEHMANN for the ESTATE of CAROLE DEIDRE YOUNG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 June 2024 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: D Wood for the Appella...
...PAL 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Alexandra 2 1.0 1 Ashburton 1 1.0 1 Auckland 64 2.2 2 Blenheim 7 3.1 1 Christchurch 28 2.4 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 152 2.2 2 Dunedin 8 2.3 2 Gisborne 12 4.3 3 Gore 2 1.0 1 Greymouth 1 1.0 1 Hamilton 17 4.4 4 Hastings 8 2.0 2 Hawera 1 1.0 1 Huntly 2 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 9 1.4 1 Invercargill 6 2.0 2 Kaikohe 9 1.8 1 Kaitaia 5 1.4 1 Levin 4 2.8 3...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC lo~ of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of a purported appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act GORDON MOASE Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent WAIMUMU ROAD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge M Harland sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: l O JiJ~ ;lbl 9 Date of Issue: 1 JU_ 1 2019 DE...