14902 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 53 READT 053/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PAUL C DAVIE of Auckland, Real Estate Agent Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MANISH GORADIA of Auckland, Complainant vendor Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Membe...
...be that she told Mr CD she would need research and drafting assistance, that she would need to actively involve Ms EF, and that Mr CD agreed to that.2 [10] Ms EF says she is not aware of Mr CD raising any questions about her involvement in the appeal with Ms GH. There is no reason to believe Ms GH was authorised to renegotiate the terms of Ms EF’s engagement with Mr CD, or that she did so. She makes no reference to having had any discussions with Mr CD that might have modifi...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 52 READT 067/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN CLINTON HARDY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 302) Respondent Hearing: 11 April 2016 Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Ms C Sandelin - Member Appearances: Mr T Rea for the applicant Ms Lawson-B...
...the mix, they must not be applied to the point that the underlying statutory objectives are undermined. [6] None of this is novel. In Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee (decided under the Employment Contracts Act 1991), the Court of Appeal acknowledged that the Employment Court had developed an approach to costs that deviated from the ‘standard’ approach which applied in other Courts.7 [7] The ‘standard’ approach, as the Court later explained in Joint Action...
...costs reasonably incurred has generally been regarded as helpful in ordinary cases, but careful attention must be given to factors said to justify an increase or a decrease. 5 [24] In a 2004 judgment, Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsley, the Court of Appeal referred to the position as to costs which pertained at the time and observed that although it would be open to the Employment Court to choose to adopt the High Court approach as to costs, it had not done so and that it was perfectly e...
...placed upon the Labour Inspector to first be given authority to commence proceedings against Mr Brill and then how the claim against him needed to be proved.2 The Court made a majority decision on these issues and Mr Brill then sought leave to appeal the Court’s decision to the Court of Appeal. Leave was granted, and the questions considered by the Court of Appeal and its answers are set out as follows:3 A We answer the two questions of law submitted for determination by this...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 015 ACR 197/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GREGORY CREIGHTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 6 December 2021 Heard at: Palmerston North/Te Papaioea Appearances: Mr Creighton in person Mr M Clarke-Parker and Ms H I...
...would apply if these offenders had been re-integrated into the communities they offended against and not deported. However, the High Court has found as a matter of law that this is not how the Act is to be interpreted. 11. The Crown promptly appealed against the High Court’s decision. That appeal was heard on 2 February 2023 and the decision of the Court of Appeal is reserved. In the meantime, the House may, and I do, disagree with the High Court’s decision. But it is of the...
...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 117 ACAR 245/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 July 2024 Held at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 163 ACR 35/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JAMES SANDERS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 6 October 2023 Held at: Wellington by AVL Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the Appellant T Lynskey and B Marten for the Accident Compensati...