BC v BB Ltd [2023] NZDT 376 (18 July 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]
...says that Mr N advised her at the time of purchase that the bulb, while second-hand, had probably used only 500 hours of its lifespan of 1,000 hours. Therefore, because the Club only intended to hold fortnightly meetings, the remaining 500 hours was appealing to her. However, she says that the Club only gained 3.6 percent of the lifespan of the bulb/projector as represented. She says that the Projector failed after minimal use: she says it was only used at 12 Club meetings for 90 minutes...