Search Results

1. [2010] NZCA 385 CA504/2009 Bluestar Print Group NZ Ltd v Mitchell [pdf, 34 KB]

   BLUESTAR PRINT GROUP (NZ) LTD V DAVID MITCHELL CA CA504/2009 19 August 2010 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA504/2009 [2010] NZCA 385 BETWEEN BLUESTAR PRINT GROUP (NZ) LTD Appellant AND DAVID MITCHELL Respondent Hearing: 10 August 2010 Court: O'Regan P, Randerson and Stevens JJ Counsel: C Heaton for Appellant P B Churchman as counsel assisting the Court Judgment: 19 August 2010 at 2.30 p.m. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The appeal is...

2. Submissions on behalf of Guardians of the Bays Incorporated (dated 13 April 2018) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...1 To allow WIAL to make progress with its application to the Director General of Civil Aviation (Director) for approval of its proposed Runway Safety Area Extension (RESA). 2 The Hurunui proceedings related to the withdrawal of an appeal following the filing of a consent memorandum (but before any decision of the Court following the consent memorandum). 2 review of the authorities confirms that the section 279(4)(c) power to strike out for abuse of process...

3. [2021] NZACC 2 - Judkins v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 183 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 2 ACR 104/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN BARRY JUDKINS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 2 December 2020 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: J Robinson for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment:...

4. Horticulture New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 222 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2017-AKL- 000096 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of appeals under Clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN Director General of Conservation Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT...

5. QC Ltd v YX [2020] NZDT 1470 (23 June 2020) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

6. RC v LUD Group Ltd [2021] NZDT 1380 (20 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

7. NN Ltd v FS [2021] NZDT 1403 (28 April 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

8. IM v KZ [2021] NZDT 1627 (9 July 2021) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

9. RQ & TQ v SR & N Trust Ltd [2022] NZDT 127 (11 August 2022) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

10. NB & TL v UQ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1657 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...