Search Results

1. [2025] NZREADT 02 - DQ & KU v CAC 2204 Rule (03 February 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...paginated bundle of the documents that were before the Committee and a paginated bundle of the emails between the Authority and the purchasers. Submissions [16] The Tribunal has received from the purchasers: 1. Submissions (“Reasons for Appealing the Decision”) filed with the notice of appeal (24 August 2024). 2. Substantive submissions (16 October 2024). 3. Application for leave to file fresh evidence (16 October 2024). 4. Affidavit of a purchaser in support of applicat...

2. Trustees of the Maungatautari 4G Section IV Trust v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 634 (2015 APPEAL 634) [pdf, 314 KB]

   2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 634 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20150001617 APPEAL 2015/9 UNDER Sections 58 and 79 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV Block BETWEEN TRUSTEES OF THE MAUNGATAUTARI 4G SECTION IV TRUST Appellants AND MAUNGATAUTARI ECOLOGICAL ISLAND TRUST First Respondent AND WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Second Respondent AND TED TAUROA Thir...

3. Ratahi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Section 53 Block IX Opunake SD being part Ngati Kahumate Block comprised in CT D4/240 (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...proceedings and instead directed that a judicial conference be convened to discuss time-tabling orders to give the applicants the chance to present their case in opposition. At a subsequent judicial conference Mrs Hughes raised the issue of leave to appeal my decision of 10 August 2007, which she referred to as a provisional or preliminary determination. A hearing was then set down for 17 October 2007 where all counsel, apart from Mr Lawrence who was unavailable due to illness, made...

4. The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated 150 [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...process, for many years to achieve improved outcomes for nature conservation. 3. Forest and Bird is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991. 4. Forest and Bird is interested in all of the matters appealed by Brookby. 5. Forest and Bird opposes the appeal because the grounds of appeal are unfounded. In particular: a. the provisions appealed do not operate as a “form of veto” over development of the underlying land (Brookby...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 014 Abraham v Auckland Council [pdf, 205 KB]

   Abraham v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 014 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under s 325 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN W ABRAHAM (ENV-2022-AKL-002) P & M STACY (ENV-2022-AKL-004) D SMITH & J CASTELLI-SMITH (ENV-2022-AKL-005) P & M DALE as Trustees of the WAIMARU FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2022-AKL-006) W & E MORTIMER as Trustees of the KARAMAROA FAMILY...

6. Consent Order - Walden, Straits Protection Society & Smart v Auckland Council [pdf, 1021 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of appeals under s 156(3) of the LGA TPA RWALDEN ENV-2016-AKL-000229 THE STRAITS PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED ENV-2017 -AKL-000096 G & C SMART ENV-2017-AKL-000110 Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Enviro...

7. Firmin v ACC [2014] NZACA [pdf, 44 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 11 ACA 01/06 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN PETER JOHN FIRMIN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING On the papers AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL K Murray, advocate for the appellant H Evans, counsel for the respondent DECISION ON COS...

8. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 145 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...IDENTIFY THE APPLICANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 145 ACR 253/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN DN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Applicant is self-represented C Light for the Corporati...

9. Legal aid criminal case assignment report - 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2014 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...5.4 1 Category 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Ashburton 6 1.2 1 Auckland 61 2.2 2 Blenheim 7 2.9 1 Christchurch 30 2.3 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 131 1.9 1 Dargaville 1 1.0 1 Dunedin 8 2.0 2 Gisborne 10 2.5 2 Greymouth 2 2.0 2 Hamilton 22 3.8 2 Hastings 3 2.7 3 Hawera 3 1.0 1 Huntly 1 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 7 1.1 1 Invercargill 7 1.7 1 Kaikohe 10 2.3 1 Kaitaia...

10. Lochiel Farmlands Limited v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...COURT AGAINST DECISION ON PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 1 TO THE WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN Clause 14(1) of First Schedule, Resource Management Act 1991 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland INTRODUCTION 1 LOCHIEL FARMLANDS LIMITED (LFL) appeals against parts of the decision of the Waikato Regional Council (WRC) on Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 – Waikato and Waipa River Catchments (PC1). 2 LFL made a submission on PC1. 3 LFL is not a trade competitor for the...