Search Results

1. Lehmann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2024] NZACC 108 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 108 ACAR 179/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KELLIE LEHMANN for the ESTATE of CAROLE DEIDRE YOUNG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 June 2024 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: D Wood for the Appella...

2. Criminal case assignment report for 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Category 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Alexandra 1 1.0 1 Auckland 66 2.3 1 Blenheim 5 5.0 6 Christchurch 34 2.7 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 161 2.6 2 Dannevirke 1 1.0 1 Dargaville 1 1.0 1 Dunedin 9 2.8 2 Gisborne 10 1.6 1 Gore 7 1.3 1 Greymouth 4 1.0 1 Hamilton 26 2.9 2 Hastings 12 3.3 3 Hawera 2 1.0 1 Huntly 4 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 12 1.7 1 Invercargill 8...

3. Criminal case assignment report 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Category 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Alexandra 1 1.0 1 Auckland 66 2.3 1 Blenheim 5 5.0 6 Christchurch 34 2.7 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 161 2.6 2 Dannevirke 1 1.0 1 Dargaville 1 1.0 1 Dunedin 9 2.8 2 Gisborne 10 1.6 1 Gore 7 1.3 1 Greymouth 4 1.0 1 Hamilton 26 2.9 2 Hastings 12 3.3 3 Hawera 2 1.0 1 Huntly 4 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 12 1.7 1 Invercargill 8...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 056 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 663 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 5 fa IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2017-AKL-190) Applicant/Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Judge 0 A Kirkpatrick Hearing: at Auckland on 9 April February 2018 Appearances: J C Campbell and R J Wilson for Auckland Cou...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 104 Moase v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC lo~ of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of a purported appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act GORDON MOASE Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent WAIMUMU ROAD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge M Harland sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: l O JiJ~ ;lbl 9 Date of Issue: 1 JU_ 1 2019 DE...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 177 Campbell's Block Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...any restriction on the maximum hectares of IWG per farm, suggested a percentage control, if used, of 30- 40% of total landholding and requested any regulation instead be linked to water quality outcomes. (c) Robert Grant and Campbell’s Block appealed part of the IWG rule, Rule 3 20(a)(iii)(1), to the Environment Court. (d) Wilkins filed s274 parties in support of the relief sought in those appeals as it relates to the IWG rule, Rule 20(a)(iii)(1). (e) In accordance with s27...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 131 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...appeal but involves judicial review proceedings which a litigant may bring as of right and without obtaining prior leave. That said, the normal 2 For example, Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2020] NZEmpC 143. principles which relate to appeals may still assist this Court in assessing the interests of justice. They include: (a) If no stay is granted, whether the right to seek judicial review relief will be rendered ineffectual; (b) whether any party will be injuriously...

8. [2022] NZACC 38 – Jones v ACC (14 March 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 38 ACR 340/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN STUART JONES Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 14 March 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to appeal] Introduction [1] This is an application...

9. 2017 NZSSAA 060 (18 October 2017) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...[2017] NZSSAA 052. In that case the Authority directed the Chief Executive to disclose the names of all members of the Benefit Review Committee which have dealt with appeals by that appellant. That decision is attached. The Chief Executive has appealed this decision. [3] The Authority will be bound by the decision of the High Court on this appeal. Therefore it is appropriate that, if the appellant wishes to pursue the issue of the anonymity of the Remote Client Unit and the...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 125 White & Others v Reserve Bank of NZ [pdf, 59 KB]

    ...within 21 days and Mr O’Sullivan, counsel for the plaintiffs, was given a like time in which to respond. [2] On 26 March 2012, the Registrar received a letter from Mr Chemis confirming that as the plaintiffs had filed an application for leave to appeal my judgment to the Court of Appeal, the defendant considered it would be more appropriate for the issue of costs to be determined following the resolution of the application for leave and any subsequent appeal....