Search Results

1. 5 May 2025 Bayly v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Auckland Telephone: (09) 916 9091 Facsimile: (09) 916 9090 https://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/going-to-court/pre/interpreters-language-and-disability-access/ http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS An appeal against an abatement notice prohibiting the discharge of contaminants associated with the making or storage of silage in relation to farm property at 480 Inksters Road, Towai, Northland An appeal against an abatement notice requir...

2. Appellate judgments 2022

   ...Radio New Zealand Limited [2022] NZSC 117 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [2022] NZSC 69 TUV v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [2022] NZSC 15 Head and Ors v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department and Anor APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL - no question of law of general public importance - application declined. [2022] NZSC 9 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Limited APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICATION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE - APPLICATION FOR STAY - no grounds for app...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

3. Resources

   ...under the Resource Management Act 1991. Information about the Resource Management Act It also deals with proceedings under other Acts. Some of the more common ones are: Electricity Act 1992 Disputes about land access to existing works. Forests Act 1949 Appeals about felling beech forests. Historic Places Act 1993 Appeals about archaeological sites. Local Government Act 1974 Objections to road stopping proposals. Public Works Act 1981 Objections to the compulsory taking of land. Government Road...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Representing yourself in the Environment Court

4. Harvey v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 7 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2015] NZACA 7 ACA 6/2013 Thomas Harvey Appellant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Advocate for the Appellant: M Darke Counsel for the Respondent: I McLaughlin Date of Hearing: 25 May 2015 Date of Decision: 11 June 2015 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________...

5. [2021] NZACC 96 – Prater v ACC (6 July 2021) [pdf, 237 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 96 ACR 20/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN P PRATER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 30 March 2021 Supplementary Submissions Completed 26 May 2021 Heard at: Whangarei\Whangārei-Terenga-Parāoa Appearances: Ms Br...

6. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal) [2023] NZACC 183 [pdf, 909 KB]

7. International Education Appeal Authority

   The Authority has been disestablished and no longer takes complaints. If you're an international student wanting to make a complaint about your education provider, get more information from iStudent Complaints

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Students

8. [2017] NZEnvC 092 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT INTHE MAnER AND BETWEEN AND INTHEMAnER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 9 2 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMM...

9. Yuan v REAA CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 44 [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member APPEARANCES Mr Yuan in person Mr McCoubrey for the First Respondent No appearance for the Second Respondent HEARD at Auckland on 9th May 2014 Introduction [1] Mr Yuan appeals against both the decision and the penalty decision of the Complaints Assessment Committee (“CAC”). Mr Yuan is a licensed salesperson working in Auckland. [2] The second respondent Mr Owers complained to the Real Estate Agents Aut...

10. Manchester Securities Limited [2013] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 80 KB]

    ...nor does the Act define the point at which a dwelling is regarded as built for the purposes of s14. That issue, however, was the subject of consideration by the High Court in Garlick, Sharko, Osborne and Turner1 and more recently by the Court of Appeal in Osborne and Sharko.2 [5] The Court of Appeal found Lang J’s observation in Garlick to be helpful when he concluded that the word “built” needs to be given its natural and ordinary meaning which he took to be the point...