Search Results

1. EI v MG Ltd [2025] NZDT 4 (14 April 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

2. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (on application for leave to appeal) [2025] NZACC 188 [pdf, 143 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 188 ACAR 53/25 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN WARREN SMITH Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: Appellant self-represented Ms Becroft for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 4 November...

3. BN v XO [2025] NZDT 242 (11 July 2025) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

4. BQ v HM [2025] NZDT 225 (15 June 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

5. ID v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 247 (10 June 2025) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

6. KD v N Ltd [2025] NZDT 209 (30 June 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

7. Overview - Hearing process [pdf, 207 KB]

   Overview — Hearing Process in the Social Security Appeal Authority After the Notice of Appeal has been filed The appellant will be provided with all relevant documents, including a report setting out the reasons for the decision by the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) (“the regulation 249 report”). A timetable will be set for providing documents in support of the appeal and the appellant may provide further evidence that he or she wants to rely on. The parties to the appe...

8. Legal aid criminal case assignment report - 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2014 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...5.4 1 Category 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Ashburton 6 1.2 1 Auckland 61 2.2 2 Blenheim 7 2.9 1 Christchurch 30 2.3 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 131 1.9 1 Dargaville 1 1.0 1 Dunedin 8 2.0 2 Gisborne 10 2.5 2 Greymouth 2 2.0 2 Hamilton 22 3.8 2 Hastings 3 2.7 3 Hawera 3 1.0 1 Huntly 1 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 7 1.1 1 Invercargill 7 1.7 1 Kaikohe 10 2.3 1 Kaitaia...

9. Firmin v ACC [2014] NZACA [pdf, 44 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 11 ACA 01/06 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN PETER JOHN FIRMIN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING On the papers AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL K Murray, advocate for the appellant H Evans, counsel for the respondent DECISION ON COS...

10. The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated 150 [pdf, 497 KB]

    ...process, for many years to achieve improved outcomes for nature conservation. 3. Forest and Bird is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991. 4. Forest and Bird is interested in all of the matters appealed by Brookby. 5. Forest and Bird opposes the appeal because the grounds of appeal are unfounded. In particular: a. the provisions appealed do not operate as a “form of veto” over development of the underlying land (Brookby...