14610 items matching your search terms
[2018] NZSSAA 17 Reference No. SSAA 106/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at Wellington on 14 March 2018 Appearances No appearance by or on behalf of the appellant For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Deve...
...deputies). Commissioners are appointed for a term of up to 5 years on either a full or part time (75%) basis. Deputy Commissioners sit as required usually on the basis of their expertise. The Court’s functions are primarily to determine: • appeals in respect of resource consents, designations and abatement notices, • plan appeals in respect of the content of regional and district planning instruments, applications for enforcement orders, and • inquiries in respect of...
...Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SL Cogan for plaintiff Ms V Casey QC and Ms A Lawson for defendants DATE OF HEARING: 17 December 2021 DATE OF DECISION: 15 February 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON ISSUE OF DAMAGES REMITTED BY COURT OF APPEAL1 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Damages) [2022] NZHRRT 7. Note publication restrictions.] 2 AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Second Defendant AND DEPARTMENT OF THE PRIME MINISTER AND CABINET...
...no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Court of Appeal (Schedule H) – Base Fees Schedules H &a...
...no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Court of Appeal (Schedule H) – Base Fees Schedules H &a...
...QLDC – Bike Wanaka and A-G – Waiver decision BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 126 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN MICHAEL BERESFORD (ENV-2018-CHC-69) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Sitting alone pursuant to s279 of t...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC l59 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals under s 120 of the Act A BURGOYNE / TE TAUMATA KAUMATUA 0 NGATI KURI RESEARCH UNIT (ENV-2018-AKL-000121 ) DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2018-AKL-000126) Appellants NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent MOTUTANGI-WAIHARARA USERS GROUP Applicants WATER Court: Environmen...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 222 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) BETWEEN TĀMAKI REGENERATION LIMITED (ENV-2024-AKL-188) Appellant/Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge DA Kirkpatrick Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 12 September 2024 Submissions: J Caldwell and N Summerfield for Tām...
...Commissioners increasingly common – all attend “Making Good Decisions Course” – Public – No unnecessary formalities and no cross examination – Sensitive information can be protected – Decision in writing – Resource consent commences once appeal period expires – Plan Changes become operative by resolution of the Council • Local Differences – Very across the Country – understand what is on offer – Raise any concern through the Chair – Watch issue of pre...
...Practice Note reflects in clause 6.6(c): If the decision appealed against would have imposed an unusual restriction upon the appellant's rights, and the restriction is not upheld, costs may be awarded against the respondent Council. On other appeals, the Court will not normally award costs against the public body whose decision is the subject of the appeal unless it has failed to perform its duties properly or has acted unreasonably. (emphasis added) [15] The Practice Not...