Search Results

1. [2021] NZREADT 22 - Jenkins v The Real Estate Agents Authority, Roberts & Tai Rakena (14 May 2021) [pdf, 316 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 22 READT 027/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GLENN and MARY ANN JENKINS Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2001) First Respondent AND MITCHELL ROBERTS and PEHIMANA TAI RAKENA Second Respondents Hearing: 16 April 2021, at Christchurch Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairpe...

2. Rules-Committee-Amendment-Rules-2022.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...released 2. The Cabinet paper noted you would proactively release the paper, in full, within 30 business days of the decision. In accordance with CO (18) 4, we recommend releasing: 2.1 the Cabinet paper: Amendments to the High Court Rules 2016, Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, and Supreme Court Rules 2004; 2.2 The Cabinet Legislation Committee minute LEG-22-MIN-0017; and 2.3 the Cabinet minute CAB-22-MIN-0053. 3. We have not recommended any redactions be made to the Cabinet paper....

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 50/07 Service and Food Workers Union Inc v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...2007 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This interlocutory judgment deals with: • the appropriate plaintiff parties; • whether hearing of the wages arrears claim should be stayed pending the determination of an appeal that has been lodged; and • whether additional particulars of the claim and defence should be given. [2] Claims for wages for employees purportedly locked out have been set down for hearing on 17 and 18 September 2007, having been r...

4. Appeal against access direction - reply (s105) [pdf, 224 KB]

   P a g e | 1 APPEAL AGAINST ACCESS DIRECTION_ REPLY Please fill in all sections below: Appellant’s name ________________________________________________________________________ First Middle Surname Step 1. Respondent(s) (please provide your details) Name __________________________________________________________________________________ First

5. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

   2018 Maori Appellate Court MB 170 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20170004176 APPEAL 2017/13 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF OMAHU 4C SECTION 6 BETWEEN WERO KARENA Applicant AND DOUGLAS WHITFIELD First Respondent AND MARK DENNIS ALEXANDER Second Respondent Hearing: 20 February 2018 (Heard at Hastings) Court: Judge S Te A Milroy (Presiding)...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 028 McIntyre v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ( ( BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. (2018) NZEnvC 28 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act DR MciNTYRE and WAITAKI TRUSTEES GOLDEN ACRES LIMITED (ENV-2011-CHC-138) Appellants CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision : 9 March 2018 Date of Issue: 9 March 2...

7. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society [PDF, 487 KB]

   ...1991. 4. Forest & Bird received notice of the decision on or about 22 April 2020. 5. The decision was made by the Waikato Regional Council. 6. Forest & Bird is willing to participate in alternative dispute resolution. PARTS OF DECISION APPEALED, REASONS FOR APPEAL, AND RELIEF SOUGHT 7. The parts of the decision that Forest and Bird is appealing, the reasons and the relief are set out in Table 1. These relate to the provisions regarding primarily indigenous biodiversity, t...

8. Clark v Trustees of Opehuia Whānau Trust - Kapenga A No 5 [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 361 (2019 APPEAL 361) [pdf, 209 KB]

   2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 361 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20170007462 APPEAL 2018/3 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of confirmation made on 8 December 2017 at 177 Waiariki MB 254- 268 in respect of Kapenga A No 5 BETWEEN URUTOMO DEBBIE CLARK AND LORIN MANAHI Appellants AND TRUSTEES OF OPEHUIA WHĀNAU TRUST...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 163 Klinkhamer v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC I G 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal against an abatement notice under s 325 of the Act SIMON KLINKHAMER (ENV-2019-AKL-000271) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under ss 279( 1 )(b) and 309( 1 )(a) of the Act Hearing: On the papers Date of Decision: 1...

10. Appellate judgments 2020

    Supreme Court [2020] NZSC 130 Rachelle v Air NZ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – application was made out of time but leave to extend time granted – Employment Court decision was orthodox costs decision – no issue of law or exceptional circumstances – application dismissed. [2020] NZSC 60 Underhill v Coca-Cola Amatil (NZ) Limited APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – Court of Appeal’s decision was not a matter of general or public importance – no error of law – application dismissed...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. Judgments >
    3. Appellate court judgments