Search Results

1. TB v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 133 (25 August 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

2. SM v UU Ltd [2022] NZDT 159 (15 December 2022) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

3. Roberts v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2022] NZACC 208 [pdf, 192 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 208 ACR 266/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JASON ROBERTS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 November 2022 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua Nui A Kahumatamomoe Appearances: Mr C Leaf for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident C...

4. TT Ltd v TG Trust [2022] NZDT 136 (17 August 2022) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 190 Marine Farming Association v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 610 KB]

   S St. "'� IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE MA TIER AND BET\v'EEN AND AND Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 190 of the Resource Management Act 1991 appeals under dause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act MARINE FARMING ASSOCIATION & AQUACULTURE NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2020-CHC-74) APEX MARINE FARM LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-63) Appellants NlARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 121 Cullinan v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 425 KB]

   Cullinan v Kaipara District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 121 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PATRICK CULLINAN (ENV-2022-AKL-00054) Appellant/Applicant AND KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Order: 1 July 2022 Date of Issue: 1...

7. [2022] NZACC 94 - Black v ACC (19 May 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ACR 272/20 Black IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 94 ACR 272/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JEREMY BLACK Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 28 April 2022 Heard at: Christchurch/ Ōtautahi Appearances: Appellant in person Mr D Russ for the Respondent Judgment: 19...

8. UO & NO v HS Ltd & JI & HM [2021] NZDT 1587 (21 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

9. EI v SB & HS [2015] NZDT 1437 (28 October 2015) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...that are otherwise arguable against persons who have committed alleged wrongs in their capacity as liquidators. 22. I am supported in my view by the decision of Asher J in Warren Metals Ltd v Grant [2013] NZHC 263. This case was a successful appeal against a District Court decision that struck out the appellant’s cause of action on the basis that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to review the acts of liquidators. 23. The case arose from a dispute over ownership of a...

10. DI v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 583 (5 December 2023) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...