14889 items matching your search terms
2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 652 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180005233 Appeal 2018/10 UNDER Section 79, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block BETWEEN VIVIENNE THERESSE TAUEKI Appellant AND HOROWHENUA 11 (LAKE) MĀORI RESERVATION TRUST First Respondent AND MANAWATU-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL TRADING AS HORIZONS Second Respondent Hearing:...
...lawyer’s notes. Mr C also has an uncontested decision of the CAC supporting his view that the increase in price was a counter-offer on the same deal. 37. In summary, the documentation, and the CAC decision, supports B Ltd. That decision was not appealed. IN then waited another 4 years to file his claim in the Disputes Tribunal. The MM legal file is not available. Mr H is no longer a manager at B Ltd, and the import of his letter in the context of the negotiations, and the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 159 ACR 206/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DENISE HAWKINS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 28 September 2021 Heard at: Virtual Meeting Room Appearances: Mr J Miller for the appellant Mr I Hunt for the respondent...
...should either be suspended or cancelled (and reapplication prohibited) until he completes the training. 2 SC v Wharekura, above n 1, at [73]. 6 [21] A claim for compensation of $58,212.44 (as amended on 3 October 2025) comprises: Appeal fees – IPT $ 700.00 Adviser fees – IPT $ 5,750.00 Adviser fees – complaint $ 2,300.00 Relocation costs-airfare $ 1,790.44 Lost wages – New Zealand $47,672.00 $58,212.44 [22] There are supporting documents for each...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 88 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals pursuant to s1 20 of the Act BETWEEN CLEARWATER MUSSELS LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-40 and 41) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Environment Commissioner J A Hodges Hearing: at Christchurch on 4-7 December 2017 Appearances: Q...
...claim challenging the Authority’s determination was filed on 11 August 2008. The parties initially requested that the challenge be dealt with on the papers. An adjournment was subsequently granted, by agreement, pending delivery of the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trade Unions Inc. 1 That judgment was delivered on 21 July 2010. Mr Yukich, advocate for the plaintiff, then advised the Court that the union was in ba...
FURTHER DRAFT BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision no: [2013] NZREADT 6 Ref Nos: NZREADT 69/11, 73/11 & 88/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN WANDA (DIANA) JOLEN (69/11) CLARE BOLESWORTH AND DIETER CHALLENOR (73/11) ELAINE ROSS (88/11) Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND CLARE BOLESWORTH AND DIETER CHALLENOR (69/11) WANDA (...
BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 7 ACA 9/12 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN KAREN FAYE YOUNG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING 17 February 2014 at Dunedin AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL Mr Sara, counsel for appellant; Mr Barnett and Mr Evans, counsel for respondent...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 68 ACR 177/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN M BROUGHTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 March 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: M Williams for the appellant R Williams and S Churstain for the respondent...
...party wishes to seek costs they are to file an application within 20 working days, replies to be filed within 15 working days, and any final reply five days thereafter. Such an application is not encouraged. REASONS Introduction These appeals relate to mangrove removal under the Proposed Northland Regional Plan (PNRP). The status and standards for mangrove removal has had a particular focus in the Mangawhai Estuary with contested removal consents. This hearing has had...