Search Results

1. GJ v Secretary for Justice [2021] NZRA 003/2020 (25 February 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] In a decision dated 9 December 2020, The Secretary for Justice (“the Secretary”) declined approval of the Applicant as a Lead Provider for Criminal PAL 3 and Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. [2] The Secretary decided that the Applicant did not meet the criteria for approval under the Legal Services Act 2011 and the Legal Services (Quality Assurance) Regulations 2011 as a provider for the followi...

2. [2020] NZREADT 13 - Beatson - Ruling on costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 97 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 13 READT 003/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BARRY BUSTER BEATSON Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First respondent AND JAMES CRISPIN, TIM MORDAUNT & PROPERTY BROKERS LTD Second respondents Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr...

3. Ngāti Tai Hapū Inc. v Official Assignee - Lot 6 DP 343 49 (2021) 260 Waiariki MB 123 (260 WAR 123) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...on 25 August 2020 and no response was received by Mr Nicholas. 1 238 Waiāriki MB 189-195 (238 WAR 189-195). 2 238 Waiāriki MB 195 (238 WAR 195). 260 Waiariki MB 125 [7] On 8 September 2020, the applicant filed a notice of appeal and the issue of costs was adjourned pending the resolution of this matter. The appeal was dismissed on 17 June 2021 and the Māori Appellate Court referred the costs matter back to this Court for determination.3 Ngā kōrero ā te O...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 111 Humphreys v Humphreys [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...freedom to seek, receive, and impart information: … 8 Rule 11(8). 9 Erceg v Erceg [2016] NZSC 135, [2017] 1 NZLR 310 at [2]; Commissioner of Police v Doyle [2017] NZHC 3049; and Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2017] NZHC 3026 upheld on appeal in Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2018] NZCA 460. 10 See the discussion in Schenker AG v Commerce Commission [2013] NZCA 114, (2013) 22 PRNZ 286; referred to in Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [2018] NZCA 460, [2019] NZAR 30 at [32]....

5. [2022] NZEmpC 110 Fleming v Attorney-General [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...on, court hearings and decisions): 7 Rule 11(7)(a). 8 Rule 11(8). 9 Erceg v Erceg [2016] NZSC 135, [2017] 1 NZLR 310 at [2]; Commissioner of Police v Doyle [2017] NZHC 3049; and Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2017] NZHC 3026 upheld on appeal in Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2018] NZCA 460. 10 See the discussion in Schenker AG v Commerce Commission [2013] NZCA 114, (2013) 22 PRNZ 286; referred to in Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [2018] NZCA 460, [2019] NZAR 30 at [32]....

6. [2023] NZEnvC 031 Friends of Nelson Haven v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 178 KB]

   FONH v MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL – CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 31 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-CHC-33) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hear...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 117 Te Runanga o Kaikoura v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 357 KB]

   TE RUNANGA O KAIKOURA & OTHERS V MDC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 117 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN TE RŪNANGA O KAIKŌURA TE RŪNANGA O NGĀI TAHU (ENV-2023-CHC-67) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under...

8. Evans v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2025] NZACC 75 (8 May 2025) [pdf, 144 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 075 ACAR 48/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN TIMOTHY EVANS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Heard at: Christchurch on 8 April 2025 and on the Papers Appearances: No appearance for Mr Evans Ms Becroft for the Corporation Decision...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10/07 Nola & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Opposition to application [12] On behalf of the respondent, Mrs Irwin submitted that the applicants’ correspondence with the Employment Relations Authority shows that they were fully aware of the time limits, the cost, and the mechanism for filing an appeal and this is not a case like many others where the applicants were not well served by their representatives. As they had failed to seek legal representation throughout, all fault for the belated filing must lie with them....

10. H & Anor v CAC 20004 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 72 [pdf, 179 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 72 READT 052/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN H and T X Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20004) First respondent AND COLLEEN (VICKI) NELSON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD at X City on 3 June 2014 DATE OF SUBS...