GN v TS LCRO 71 / 2011 (24 November 2011) [pdf, 96 KB]
...to re-litigate aspects of the first proceeding that [the Applicant] felt should have been dealt with then.” He noted that the District Court proceeding (involving M) found in his client‟s favour on all grounds, and that the Applicant had not appealed that decision. [12] The Practitioner also noted that the Applicant had the opportunity to make her own submissions to the Court in relation to his submissions and had taken that opportunity. He referred to the Judge‟s decision...