Search Results

1. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

   2018 Maori Appellate Court MB 170 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20170004176 APPEAL 2017/13 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF OMAHU 4C SECTION 6 BETWEEN WERO KARENA Applicant AND DOUGLAS WHITFIELD First Respondent AND MARK DENNIS ALEXANDER Second Respondent Hearing: 20 February 2018 (Heard at Hastings) Court: Judge S Te A Milroy (Presiding)...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 028 McIntyre v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ( ( BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. (2018) NZEnvC 28 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act DR MciNTYRE and WAITAKI TRUSTEES GOLDEN ACRES LIMITED (ENV-2011-CHC-138) Appellants CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision : 9 March 2018 Date of Issue: 9 March 2...

3. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society [PDF, 487 KB]

   ...1991. 4. Forest & Bird received notice of the decision on or about 22 April 2020. 5. The decision was made by the Waikato Regional Council. 6. Forest & Bird is willing to participate in alternative dispute resolution. PARTS OF DECISION APPEALED, REASONS FOR APPEAL, AND RELIEF SOUGHT 7. The parts of the decision that Forest and Bird is appealing, the reasons and the relief are set out in Table 1. These relate to the provisions regarding primarily indigenous biodiversity, t...

4. Clark v Trustees of Opehuia Whānau Trust - Kapenga A No 5 [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 361 (2019 APPEAL 361) [pdf, 209 KB]

   2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 361 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20170007462 APPEAL 2018/3 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of confirmation made on 8 December 2017 at 177 Waiariki MB 254- 268 in respect of Kapenga A No 5 BETWEEN URUTOMO DEBBIE CLARK AND LORIN MANAHI Appellants AND TRUSTEES OF OPEHUIA WHĀNAU TRUST...

5. XP v L Ltd [2025] NZDT 152 (9 May 2025) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

6. Williams v Mullins - Maukoro Reserve (B1B 2 & B1C2) A [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 532 (2025 APPEAL 532) [pdf, 210 KB]

   2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 532 Mitchell v Edwards - Maukoro Reserve (B 1B 2 & B 1C 2) A Block [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 532 (2025 APPEAL 532) I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District AP-20250000007182 APPEAL 2025/13 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Maukoro Reserve (B 1B 2 & B 1C 2) A Bl...

7. CI v T Society [2025] NZDT 207 (9 July 2025) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 163 Klinkhamer v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC I G 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal against an abatement notice under s 325 of the Act SIMON KLINKHAMER (ENV-2019-AKL-000271) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under ss 279( 1 )(b) and 309( 1 )(a) of the Act Hearing: On the papers Date of Decision: 1...

9. Appellate judgments 2020

   Supreme Court [2020] NZSC 130 Rachelle v Air NZ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – application was made out of time but leave to extend time granted – Employment Court decision was orthodox costs decision – no issue of law or exceptional circumstances – application dismissed. [2020] NZSC 60 Underhill v Coca-Cola Amatil (NZ) Limited APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – Court of Appeal’s decision was not a matter of general or public importance – no error of law – application dismissed...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

10. Form 26 Fixed Fees H-I [pdf, 269 KB]

    ...GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Date activity/fixed fee completed Final invoice Interim invoice Date of final disposition (if final invoice) Court of Appeal (Schedule H) – Base Fees Schedul...