14818 items matching your search terms
Reference no: SSAA 41/24 [2025] NZSSAA 06 UNDER the Social Security Act 2018 IN THE MATTER of an Appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Hearing at Auckland on 7 November 2024 Before: T Tran (Deputy Chairperson) P Singh (Member) R Aston (Member) Appearances: XXXX presenting her own appeal...
Date of Judgment Citation MB reference MLIS Ref Legislation Subject Judge 2015 23.11.2015 Matchitt v Matchitt - Te Kaha 65 2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 662 2015 APPEAL 662 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 section 58; Maori Land Court Rules 2011, r 8.19(2) J Harvey J Ambler J Clark 17.11.2015 Gemmell v Gemmell - Mohaka A4 Trust 2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 657 2015 APPEAL 657 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 section 58 Costs DCJ Fox J Milroy J Ambler 12.10.2015 T...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 55 READT 038/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PRASHANTH KUMAR MOTUPALLY Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1903) First respondent AND JASON HAYDE & DAVID WELLS Second respondents Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Ms N O’Connor, Member Sub...
...application to join Mr O’Sullivan, advocate for Mrs Hill, as a party for the purposes of determining costs. Neither the application for joinder, nor the application for costs, has been determined. In the interim Mrs Hill has applied for leave to appeal against the substantive judgment. The application for leave has not yet been determined by the Court of Appeal. Mrs Hill seeks orders staying the applications for joinder and for costs pending the outcome of the appeal process....
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 73 ACR 047/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANTHONY BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented S Arnold for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 3 May 2022 JUDG...
...[Name of registry] Registry No: [court file number] Under the [name of Act under which the proceeding is authorised] In the matter of [specify matter to which proceeding relates] Between [full name, place of residence, occupation] Appellant, Cross-Appeal Respondent (Note: if more than 1 appellant, list them separately as 2nd appellant, 3rd appellant etc) And [full name, place of residence, occupation] Respondent, Cross-Appeal Appellant (Note: if more than 1 respondent, list them s...
...Roberts submitted, s5(1) of the Interpretation Act 1999 requires the meaning of an enactment to be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose. He cited Agnew v Pardington [2006] 2 NZLR 520 at paragraph 32 where the Court of Appeal stated: … there is no doubt that the text of a provision must be interpreted having regard to the Act as a whole and the legal system generally. [15] Mr Robert’s submitted that speedy justice is the Authority’s statutory...
...Authority considered an application for stay brought by AFFCO. The application was made on the basis that Mr Rossiter’s claim relied on two decisions of this Court, both of which were at the time subject to appellate consideration in the Court of Appeal. [7] The first appealed judgment was a decision of a full Court that Union members such as Mr Rossiter were employees of AFFCO during the off-season and, separately, that AFFCO had unlawfully locked out such employees. 2...
...second application by New Zealand Post Ltd for a stay of this proceeding and to vacate the hearing scheduled to begin on 24 February 2025. [2] NZ Post’s first application was made when an application to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal in an unrelated judgment, Rasier Operations BV v E Tū Inc, was pending.1 [3] NZ Post’s second application was filed on 14 January 2025 and followed the Supreme Court granting leave to appeal in the Rasier case.2 The first app...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000085 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY SOUTH WAIKA...