14884 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 91 READT 035/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RONG JUN (JUNE) ZHANG Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 406) First respondent AND BRYAN ISAAC RICHARDSON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Ms C Sandelin – Member HEARD at Auckland on 26 No...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 11 READT 008/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JOHN REVANS EICHELBAUM of Auckland, Barrister Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (per CAC 303) First respondent AND ROSALYN CLAIRE WHITE of Rahuikiri Road, Pakiri Beach, Auckland, Real Estate Agent Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chai...
...It should also be noted that the letter of 21 April was not accompanied by the prescribed fee. There is no provision for the waiver or acceptance of late payment of the prescribed fee. The failure to pay a prescribed fee for the bringing of an appeal or other application that a decision be reviewed will be fatal to an application. This will be the case even where the fee is subsequently paid: Cahayag v Removal Review Authority [1998] 2 NZLR 72; [1998] NZAR 145. As such the informal...
...complaint. Ms YD’s client had been criticised by the High Court and ordered to contribute towards the indemnity costs which the Court ordered the lawyer’s client to pay. The Court suppressed the name of the lawyer. [3] The lawyer successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal confirmed the suppression order. [4] Mr NW identified the lawyer when making the complaint about the lawyer to the Lawyers Complaints Service. 2 [5] When responding to Mr NW...
...refer to as Walmsley). Any effect that might have in resolving what might be a fair and reasonable contribution to the Aitchisons' costs is to be considered shortly. [3] For completeness, we note that the declaration decision was upheld on appeal to the High Court in a Judgment delivered by Clark Jon 9 June 2017.2 [4] The other, quite separate, proceedings dealt with the issue of the adverse effects of the fence/structure in terms of the duty to avoid adverse effects contained...
...The Commissioner is also unable to approve a proposed representative unless he or she considers that the representative has the required knowledge of the case (new section 89T(3)). Finally, we note that decisions of the Commissioner are able to be appealed to the Family Court (new section 103A) and that parties are able to be legally represented at these proceedings. 12. We have therefore come to the conclusion that new section 89T(6) is consistent with the principles of natural justice....
...review under the Act:3 2 Standards Committee determination (10 June 2014) at [3] and [7]–[8]. 3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...
...or preliminary thereto, by or to any person who is a party to these proceedmgs or to whom leave has been granted to the Court to be heard". The Interlocutory proceedings were heard prIOr to the Appellate Court moving to hear the substantive appeal. No security for costs had been ordered by the Appellate Court in respect of the injunctIOn applicatIOn although security had been fixed by the Appellate Court In respect of the appeal. No sum at that pOint had been paid into Court as...
...to B, under section 325(3E) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court grants ex parte a stay of the abatement notice dated 20 December 2018. B: The stay will automatically lapse on: (a) Friday 15 February 2019 if a Notice of Appeal against the abatement notice has not been lodged and served on the Council by that date; or (b) Monday 26 April 2019 if a new resource consent or application to vary conditions has not been applied for by that date. C: Leave is reserv...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2017-AKL- 000097 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of appeals under Clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN DairyNZ Limited Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991...