Search Results

1. Bartlett v Clay - Pouto 2E4A (2016) 133 Taitokerau MB 264 (133 TTK 264) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...See for example Putataua Bay Holdings Ltd v Pere - Roadway Order Instrument 7895326.1 (2015) 105 Taitokerau MB 103 (105 TTK 103). 4 Te Hokowhitu v Proprietors of Matauri X – Matauri X Incorporation [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 566 (2010 APPEAL 566), O.Malley v Wyborn - Orokawa 3C2B [2010] Maori Appellate Court MB 494 (2010 APPEAL 494), and Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club - Horowhenua11 (Lake) Block [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 60 (2014 APPEAL 60). 133 Taitokerau MB 267...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 054 Tasman District Council [pdf, 496 KB]

   ...(Variation 1) to Plan Change 60 (PC60) to the District Plan. [4] PC60 was a plan change to the District Plan which was notified in January 2016. A number of submissions were received, hearings held by the Council and decisions issued and six appeals were lodged to the Environment Court. understand that five of those appeals have been resolved by consent order and that O the remaining appeal is currently before the High Court awaiting a decision. In f:"I: tY~ ort, PC60 has al...

3. Davis - Tapuwae 1B and 4 Incorporation (2005) 102 Whangārei MB 206 (102 WH 206) [pdf, 363 KB]

   ...the payment of $2000.00 as security for costs. That sum has been refunded. The new application was set down for a substantive hearing to be held on 16 August 2002. Before that hearing, the Committee of Management instructed solicitors to file an appeal against the decision of the Maori Land Court made in July 2002. The Maori Appellate Court heard the appeal on 11 August 2003. In September 2003 it released its decision. (See 6 APWH 113-115) The appeal Court held that the lower Cour...

4. Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Application for Compliance Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...obtain but for the interference. [255.4] Damages of $60,000 are awarded against the Attorney-General under ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) for loss of dignity and injury to feelings. [2] From this decision the defendants (hereinafter the Crown) have appealed to the High Court. It is understood that appeal will be heard on 10 to 12 September 2018. The application [3] At 4:59pm on Tuesday 26 June 2018 Mr Dotcom filed an urgent application seeking compliance orders and in particular:...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 154 Coastal Ratepayers United Incorporated v Kapiti Coast District Council [pdf, 472 KB]

   ...provisions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 identified in the Interim Decision in these proceedings The Final Decision reserved costs and CRU filed a costs application which the Council opposed. [2017] NZEnvC 31. [2017] NZEnvC 100. 3 [6] CRU filed an appeal to the High Court against both the Interim and Final Decisions. On 29 November 2017, the High Court issued a Decision3 declining the appeal. [7] This decision resolves the costs application. I apologise to the parties for the delay...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 118 Savrim v Wellington Hospitality Group Ltd [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...be relevant but may be overwhelmed by other factors. Any assessment of the merits must necessarily be relatively superficial. Further, for a decision to refuse an extension of time to be based substantially on the lack of merit of a proposed appeal (or challenge), that lack of merit must be plain. It should be made only where the appeal is clearly hopeless.8 The delay is lengthy [11] The longer the delay in bringing an appeal, the more the applicant will be seeking an “indulg...

7. Media Information Guide COVID-19 [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...notice to the registry when a hearing is to be held remotely. More information about covering the Family Court and Youth Court can be found on the District Court website. Senior Courts Daily lists The Senior Courts (High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court) are continuing to publish Daily Lists on the Courts of New Zealand website. Journalists who wish to be notified when a new or updated list is published can follow the Courts of New Zealand twitter feed: @CourtsofNZ H...

8. [2009] NZEmpC WC 11/09 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...allegations about the process of disclosure through the Employment Court. This included the findings of the Court in three interlocutory judgments concerning disclosure. [4] The first was on 16 December 2005.1 The plaintiff sought leave to appeal unsuccessfully to the Court of Appeal.2 The second dated 27 March 20063 followed the Court’s inspection of documents disclosed by the defendant to determine relevance. The third dated 7 December 20064 included judgment on the plai...

9. Rowe & Ors v CAC306 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 82 [pdf, 111 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 82 Reference No: READT 020/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANN MAREE ROWE, RICHMOND LOWE AND AFFILIATED BUSINESS CONSULTANTS LIMITED Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 306) First Respondent AND SUSHIL MANN AND SURAYA RASALI Second Respondents BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY...

10. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 submission oppose DMI interlocutory [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    ...appeal stage which would take all or part of a proposal beyond the site of the application as defined 14 No party has taken exception to these revisions 5 in the original application. 18. In Hal/dene v Rodney District Council the appellant appealed a decision declining resource consent for the construction and operation of a rest home, Incorporating a private hospital. One of the grounds for refusing consent related to the bulk of the proposed building relative to the size o...