14884 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 102 READT 068/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PHILIP DAVIS AND HANOK SHIN AND BARFOOT & THOMPSON LIMITED Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20004) First Respondent AND SUNNY LIU Second Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Ms N Dange...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 9 READT 030/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN KAREN McTERNAN AND DEBORAH ANDREW Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 302) First respondents AND MANDY DAWSON AND KIM ASSENBERG VON EIJSDEN Second respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr G Denley – Member Ms N Dangen – M...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZREADT 10 Reference No: READT 044/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ASHIK ALI Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 302) First Respondent AND FITZGERALD LIMISELLA Second Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC − Chairperson Ms N Dangen − Member Mr C Sandelin − Member...
...17 February 2017 which confirmed that the determination of ownership in favour of the then trustees of the J and A Potroz Trust were confirmed, along with the status of the block as Māori freehold land. Counsel further submitted that Mr White appealed this Court’s decision of 30 November 2016 on 27 January 2017. In due course, the Māori Appellate Court issued its decision on 13 November 2017 dismissing the appeal. [9] Counsel submitted that Mr White had the option of further p...
...scope of review [11] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...
...enforced Augier undertakings. Great care is required, in my view, in the application of the principle lest it be extended beyond its proper role. [33] The Court is told that the principle is widely relied upon in determining resource consent appeals which are able to be settled by agreement; it assists in enabling applicants to offer attributes or mitigation beyond the jurisdiction of the Court in order to settle appeals; and it provides security for other parties in that undertak...
‘’IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 162 ACR 121/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN HARRIET MURRAY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 27 September 2021 Heard at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: Ms M Howard for the appellant Ms L Hansen for the r...
...[14] The question of the admissibility of this evidence (although not directly of the propriety of the allegations contained in the pleadings) is addressed by statute and has been informed by a number of judgments of this Court and the Court of Appeal. [15] Section 148 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) provides materially as follows (the emphasis for the purposes of this case is mine): 148 Confidentiality (1) Except with the consent of the parties or the relevant p...
...READT 035/11 and READT 046/11 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10050) AND DAPHNE BROWN Defendant AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DAPHNE BROWN Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10050) First respondent AND MARY WEALLEANS Second respondent...
...to the identification of the victims of the aggrieved person is prohibited pending further order of the Tribunal or of the Chairperson. [64.4] There is to be no search of the Tribunal file without leave of the Chairperson. [2] There has been no appeal against that decision nor any review under s 96 of the Human Rights Act. However, on or about 17 July 2013 the Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (SSGT) filed in the High Court at Wellington an application for judicial review seeking (inter...