Search Results

1. Arnold v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 157 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 157 ACAR 63/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN TERRY ARNOLD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 27 September 2024 Held at: Wellington/Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: P Schmidt for the Appellant H Evans for the Accident Compens...

2. IACDT Annual Report 2013 [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...Registrar’s own motion. After considering a complaint the Tribunal may: dismiss the complaint; uphold the complaint but take no further action; or uphold the complaint and impose one or more sanctions. The Tribunal also deals with appeals against decisions made by the IAA. These may relate to: a decision of the Registrar to cancel the licence of an immigration adviser; or a determination of the Registrar to reject a complaint against a licensed immigration adviser....

3. [2015] NZEmpC 153 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...counsel, Mr France. [12] Ms Scarborough has made no submission or supplied any information in respect of her financial position. It is known that in respect of a previous award of costs against her in these proceedings she has sought leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. Such an appeal would require payment of a substantial filing fee. In her most recent submissions, she states that she intends to commence proceedings for a judicial review. Again filing fees would be payable...

4. Bowers - Estate of Elizabeth Victoria Rodger Thorpe Shepherd [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 686 (2012 APPEAL 686) [pdf, 82 KB]

   2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 686 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20090013368 APPEAL2012/9 UNDER Section 60, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF A case stated in relation to ELIZABETH VICTORIA RODGER THORPE (SHEPHERD) pursuant to section 60 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 for an opinion of the Māori Appellate Court on points of law. Referral directed by the Māori Land Cour...

5. BORA Education Amendment Bill no three [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...the Act. BILL OF RIGHTS ACT ISSUES Section 27(1) – Right to natural justice Police vets 1 In applying section 5, we have had regard to the guidelines set out by the Court of Appeal in Ministry of Transport (MOT) v Noort [1993] 3 NZLR 260; Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; and Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2002] 2 NZLR 754. 2 6 Clauses 26 and 78 provide for police ve...

6. [2020] NZEnvC 151 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 683 KB]

   ...reserves costs for any application for costs within 10 working days and reply by Te Uri o Hikihiki HapO within a further 10 working days and any final reply 5 days thereafter. Such an application is not encouraged. REASONS Introduction [1] These Appeals relate to matters concerning the Northland Regional Council Coastal Plan Provisions. One aspect of the matters on Appeal before the Court relates to the potential for some form of Marine Protection in parts of the coastal waters....

7. LCRO 005/2019 JB v QE (10 April 2019) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...scope of review [5] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

8. LCRO 156/2012 BS v YL (10 September 2012) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...the defective application. In support of his submission he cites previous decisions of this Office1. He also submits that the extension granted to Mr BS by the Jurisdiction Manager was invalid and in support of this submission refers to Customs Appeal Authority number 29/98 2. No conflict [8] Prior to filing his application for review, Mr BS spoke to the Jurisdiction Manager who advised that he could provide his supporting reasons one week after the application form was receiv...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 150 Aquastar Holdings Ltd v Kawerau District Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   iBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND Decis ion No. [2018] NZEnvC I 50 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal against an abatement notice under s 325 of the Act of an application for enforcement orders under s 314 and 316 of the Act AQUASTAR HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-114) Appellant/Respondent KAWERAU DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent/Applicant (ENV-2017-AKL-127) Court: Environment Judge DA Ki...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-63.67.68 The Tree Council Inc & Others v Auckland Transport NOH-2016.11.21 [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...Road corridor, and Murphys Road ENV-2016-304-000031 The Tree Council Incorporated v Auckland Transport Hugh Green Limited & Green City Development Ltd v Auckland Transport SR Williams Trust & FP Williams Trust v Auckland Transport Appeal Against Decision Of Requiring Authority pursuant to Section 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appeal Against Decision Of Requiring Authority pursuant to Section 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appeal Against Decis...