Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 172 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...direction was made for any application and evidence to be filed, by Richmond Services Limited (Richmond); and for Ms Bracewell to file and serve any submissions and evidence in response. 4 [4] Ms Bracewell has filed an application for leave to appeal the Court’s judgment. It is understood that application is yet to be heard. [5] Ms Bracewell has also applied to this Court for “a stay of proceedings”, which I infer is a request for the Court to stay the orders it made....

2. ENV-2017-AKL-000155 The National Trading Company of New Zealand Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...that it confirm the provisions of the Redhills Precinct (“Precinct” and “Recommendation”) on 27 July 2016. NTC received notice of the Council’s decision to accept the Recommendation (“Decision”) on 19 August 2016. Part of Decision appealed 3. NTC appeals the part of the Decision approving I610.10.1. Redhills Precinct: Precinct plan 1 (“Precinct Plan”), and in particular the part of the Decision approving the inclusion of arterial roads, amendments to the alignme...

3. Chand v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 61 [pdf, 196 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 61 ACR 123/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN STEVEN CHAND Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented H Ifwersen for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 11 Ap...

4. DT & Ors v MU [2025] NZDT 24 (17 January 2025) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

5. BQ v TL & IL [2025] NZDT 248 (23 July 2025) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

6. Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 467 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN Director-General of Conservation Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Dated: 8 July 2020 Department of Conservation Solicitor acting: V Tumai Email: vtumai@doc.govt.nz Telephone: 027 536 6862 mailto:vtumai@doc.gov...

7. ME v TK [2014] NZIACDT 39 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...a course where he repeatedly filed unmeritorious requests, then made complaints on the same grounds. The responses from Immigration New Zealand and the Minister made it clear why his actions were inappropriate. He persisted. [3] He then lodged an appeal out of time; it could not be filed, and he did not refund the filing fee to the complainant. [4] The adviser did not challenge the statement of position setting out the complaint. The Tribunal has upheld the complaint. The complaint...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 013 CTE Holdings Limited v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 13 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to s 325 of the Act CTE HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2017-CHC-91 ) CANTERBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-3) Appellants CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick (Sitting alone under section 309 of the Act) Date of Decision: 9 Februar...

9. Walters v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal to the High Court) [2025] NZACC 169 (7 October 2025) [pdf, 181 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 169 ACAR 198/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN MALCOLM WALTERS Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: Applicant is self-represented Mr Gee for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 7 Octobe...

10. Storie & Raynes v CAC10057 & Barlow [2012] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 158 KB]

    Decision No: [2012] NZREADT 7 Reference No: READT 042/11 & READT 043/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GRAEME STORIE Appellant AND SHALERY RAYNES Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10057) First Respondent AND CHRISTOPHER AND TERESA BARLOW Second Respondents BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Mem...