Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Eichelbaum [2014] NZLCDT 68 [pdf, 189 KB]
...$400,000 allocated in the funds (which amount was for Mr Eichelbaum’s attendances) to be sought from a future underwriter of the litigation. Mr Eichelbaum was formally instructed by an Auckland firm on [redacted] 2009 to represent Mr Z on an appeal to be argued in the Court of Appeal later that month (but on the basis that they were not responsible for Mr Eichelbaum’s fees). [8] In relation to the litigation funding, it was agreed later that month that a further 10% of the J....