Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14618 items matching your search terms

  1. Song v CAC 20008 & Clement [2014] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 55 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 54 READT 030/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JINSHAN SONG of Christchurch, Complainant Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20008) First respondent AND DIANNE CLEMENT, of Christchurch, Real Estate Agent Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Ms...

  2. [2017] NZEnvC 179 Auckland International Airport Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 6.1 MB]

    ...under s 151 (5) of the LGATPA in relation to the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan. Mr Berry noted that this case needed to be limited to its particular facts: (a) it dealt with a specific legislative process; (b) it gave extremely limited rights of appeal; and (c) it dealt only with appeal from decisions notified. [23] Nevertheless, Mr Berry drew our attention to paragraph [16], where the Court noted: Council submitted that such costs would be disproportionate to any purpose that mi...

  3. Rudolph v Rudolph - Rotokakahi A3C1B (2017) 146 Taitokerau MB 143 (146 TTK 143) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...rehearing, the Court may affirm its former determination, or may vary or annul that determination, and may exercise any jurisdiction that it could have exercised on the original hearing. (6) When a rehearing has been granted, the period allowed for an appeal to the Maori Appellate Court shall not commence to run until the rehearing has been disposed of by a final order of the Court. [12] The application of s 43 of the Act was considered by the Māori Appellate Court in Henare v M...

  4. ZL v OL LCRO 51/2014 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...applied for a review. Application for review [22] On 7 March 2014 Mr [ZA] applied for a review on the following grounds: a. The Committee erred in law in determining that “proceedings” did not include law society complaints when the Court of Appeal has already rejected that argument in Teletax Consultants Ltd v Williams [1989] NZLR 698 (CA) at Annexure “A”. b. The Committee erred in law determining that the Respondent giving his personal views in evidence from the bar wa...

  5. Manuel v Carroll - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 5004 Part Waimarama 3A1A1 (2020) 83 Takitimu MB 41(83 TKT 41) [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...interpreted as a wilful refusal to vacate. For all of these reasons, Ms Manuel seeks an injunction to remove Mr Carroll from her whānau land. 2 Flight v Fletcher – Waipapa 1D2B3B (2017) APPEAL MB 4 at [38] 83 Tākitimu MB 45 Ngā kōrero a Frederick Carroll Respondent’s submissions [16] As foreshadowed, Mr Carroll was represented by Ms Bennett who subsequently withdrew as counsel. Mr Carroll then represented...

  6. Clarke v Overington - Maketu A Section 39 Block and others [2020] Chief Judge's MB 35 (2020 CJ 35) [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...for Ms Jeannie Louisa Overington, filed a memorandum advising her client does not wish to pursue the matter further and does not challenge the recommendation of the Registrar. [9] On 24 December 20192 a minute issued in relation to the associated appeal proceedings referred to at [5] above. The minute noted: (a) the Registrar’s recommendation is consistent with the errors identified in the appeal proceedings, and the course of action, as set out in the earlier decision of the M...

  7. [2022] NZACC 186 — Ismail v ACC (28 September 2022) [pdf, 394 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 186 ACR 148/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ABOOBEKER ISMAIL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION First Respondent AND WOOLWORTHS NEW ZEALAND LTD Second Respondent Hearing: 2 September 2022 Appearances: Appellant in person (via Zoom) Mr C Hlavac for th...

  8. [2021 NZACC 178 – Kirdy v ACC (8 November 2021) [pdf, 184 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 178 ACR 287/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DANIE KIRDY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 23 July 2021 Heard at: Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: The appellant in person Ms A N Lane and Mr J P Coates for the respon...

  9. [2022] NZACC 168 — Robinson v ACC (25 August 2022) [pdf, 341 KB]

    ACR 259/21 IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 168 ACR 263/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOHN ROBINSON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 26 July 2022 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: Appellant in person Ms B Johns and Ms A Lane via AVL for...

  10. [2022] NZACC 164 — Foster v ACC (23 August 2022) [pdf, 304 KB]

    ACR 262/21 IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 164 ACR 262/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DAMIAN FOSTER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION First Respondent Hearing: 25 July 2022 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the appellant Ms F Becroft for t...