Search Results

1. ARLA Practice Direction 3 - Referral of applications to authority [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...memorandum from the Secretary of the DLC giving the reasons for the referral. 5. Any such application and memorandum must be served by the DLC on the applicant, objectors and reporting agencies given that the grant of leave denies them an appeal right. They must be given the opportunity to comment or make submissions. Objectors may be served by email. 6. Section 221 of the Act specifies similar requirements in respect of any application for a manager’s certificate that...

2. Whooley - Ngaiotonga 1B1 and 2B1 and Lots 1 - 2, and 3 DP383105 (2014) 71 Taitokerau MB 38 (71 TTK 38) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Gully), which is the only decision of that Court that touches on sufficiency of support in relation to exchange orders.3 2 Rudolph v Reti – Otetao B3A2 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 143 (2011 APPEAL 143) at [40]. 3 Hanford v Māori Trustee – Ohiro 19 & 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) (2006) 15 Aotea Appellate MB 218 (15 WGAP 218). 71 Taitokerau MB 48 [37] The leading Māori Appellate Court decision on s 288(2)(b) is Wh...

3. Guest v New Zealand Law Society [2009] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 390 KB]

   ...of his name to the roll of Barristers and Solicitors of the High Court of New Zealand. Mr Guest was admitted to the Bar and thus entered on the roll on 2 December 1972. He was struck off the roll on 29 July 2002 following the rejection of his appeal to the High Court against a decision of 3 December 2001 of the New Zealand Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal that he be struck off the roll. The onus of proof is on the applicant to be readmitted. APPLICANT’S BACKGROUND...

4. RIS - Control Orders [pdf, 918 KB]

   ...the direct costs fall to government, including costs of administering a control order regime (supervision and monitoring), cost of judicial time in considering the applications and hearing time, and the Crown’s legal costs in the application and appeal processes. There will be ongoing costs of monitoring of the conditions by Police and other agencies, with costs dependant on the types of conditions imposed on the returnee. There may also be some costs associated with reintegration...

5. [2022] NZACC 8 – N v ACC (20 January 2022) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 008 ACR 037/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN N Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 November 2021 Heard at: Auckland/Tamaki Makaurau Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the appellant...

6. Copyright Licensing Limited v Universities of NZ [2013] NZCOP 18 [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...leaving the licensing scheme intact in relation to other classes of case. All those in the “classes of cases” or “cases of the description” would by default be bound, yet be unrepresented. [69] He referred to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Audio-Visual Copyright Society Ltd v University of Auckland12 (“the AVCOS case”), in which the issue was whether the Act required the relevant scheme to be accepted by one or more licensees before it could be said to be ...

7. BORA Public Health Bill [pdf, 617 KB]

   ...quarantine issues or emergencies. There are several safeguards attached to the exercise of these powers including, depending on the context, various evidential burdens, the involvement of a Court, requirement to contact and consult family or whānau, and appeal rights. Section 19(1) – Freedom from discrimination 14. Under the Bill, the list of notifiable conditions raises two prima facie issues of inconsistency with the freedom from discrimination. The first is based on the fact that...

8. Dairy-NZ-Limited-84.pdf [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...Co-operative Group Limited Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND DAIRY NZ LIMITED s274 party TO: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland DAIRY NZ LIMITED ("Dairy NZ") wishes to be a party to an appeal by Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited ("Fonterra") against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council ("Council") on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan ("PC 1"). Nature of interest...

9. Body Corporate 97010 220 [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of a notice under section 274 of the RMA on an appeal made under section 156(3) of the LGATPA BY BODY CORPORATE 97010 NOTICE UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 TO: The Registrar Environment Court AUCKLAND 1. Body Corporate 97010 (BC97010) wishes to b...

10. LCRO 106/2019 WT - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (3 September 2019) [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006”.2 [2] The reason for the application provided by Mr WT in support of his application is that he had “not been given the reasons for the decision”.3 [3] In Orlov v New Zealand Law Society4 the Court of Appeal said:5 In our view, it is clear from s 158 [of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006] that a Standards Committee is not required to give reasons for a decision made under s 152(2)(a) to refer a matter to the Tribunal....