Search Results

1. Diamondaras v Rice - Rangiuru Part No 2A Bock (2016) 148 Waiariki MB 253 (148 WAR 253) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...rehearing, the court may affirm its former determination, or may vary or annul that determination, and may exercise any jurisdiction that it could have exercised on the original hearing. (6) When a rehearing has been granted, the period allowed for an appeal to the Maori Appellate Court shall not commence to run until the rehearing has been disposed of by a final order of the court. (7) [Repealed] [19] I am guided by the general principles concerning rehearing applications as s...

2. BORA Human Tissue (Organ Donation) Amendment Bill [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...as if the child were of full age.3 We have also taken into account the common law principle, as set out in 2 In applying section 5, we have had regard to the guidelines set out by the Court of Appeal in Ministry of Transport (MOT) v Noort [1993] 3 NZLR 260 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; and Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2002] 2 NZLR 754 and Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Oak...

3. LCRO 137/2015 RR v BN, SF, WE, IM and PL (3 August 2018) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...scope of review [18] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

4. [2021] NZREADT 20 - Sheldon (5 May 2021) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...Sheldon ought to have taken more care in reporting to clients, and his conduct fall short of that required of a competent licensee. [14] Ms Lim referred to the penalty imposed in Mabruk v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409),5 where the licensee appealed against the fine imposed by a Complaints Assessment Committee following a finding of unsatisfactory conduct. The Tribunal quashed the Committee’s order that Mr Mabruk pay a fine of $1,000, leaving only an order for censure. Ms...

5. LCRO 113/2013 AB v EF (3 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...ultimately accepted, only to be advised the offer had been withdrawn. [7] The matter proceeded to a hearing. The Court upheld the termination and rejected all causes of action pleaded by Mr EF. [8] Mr AB then instructed different counsel to appeal the District Court judgment which was also unsuccessful. Mr AB’s complaints and the Standards Committee decision [9] Mr AB filed a complaint with the New Zealand Lawyers Complaints Service (the Complaints Service) in June 2012....

6. Karepa v Te Riini - Kikorangi Kareti Karepa Whanau Trust (2016) 144 Waiariki MB 3 (144 WAR 3) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Whaiti (2001) 13 Takitimu Appellate MB 184 (13 ACTK 184); Manuirirangi v Paraninihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation (2002) 15 Whanganui Appellate MB 64 (15 WGAP 64); Nicholls v Nicholls – Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) at [8]. 4 Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation, above n 2, at [13]; Riddiford v Te Whaiti, above n 3; Manuirirangi v Paraninihi Ki Waitotara Incoporation, above n 3; Nicholls v Nicholls, above n 3, at [8]; Niao v Niao, above n 3;...

7. LCRO 77/2015 EAB v FBC (7 July 2017) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...Scope of Review [20] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

8. WD v KG LCRO 185/2015 [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...scope of review [14] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:6 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

9. LCRO 55/2018 ND v RS (18 April 2019) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...scope of review [19] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

10. LCRO 193/2019 CF v YL (19 February 2021) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...scope of review [25] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...