Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 146 River Terrace Developments Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 566 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 146 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act RIVER TERRACE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-6) Appellant CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 7 September...

2. [2021] NZACC 78 - Nikora v ACC (25 May 2021) [pdf, 150 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 78 ACR 3/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN R NIKORA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent On the Papers Ms Brock for the appellant Ms Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 25 May 2021 ________________________________________________________...

3. Rapatini v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 97 [pdf, 233 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 97 ACR 89/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN ANGELINA RAPATINI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The Appellant in person Ms Becroft for the Respondent Judgment: 19 June 2023 _______...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 267 Woolley v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   WOOLLEY v MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL – COSTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 267 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN PHILIP JOHN WOOLLEY (ENV-2020-CHC-123) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven sitting alone under s279 of the Act Hearing: In chambers on the papers Last case ev...

5. Potatoes-NZ-Incorporated.PDF [PDF, 908 KB]

   Notice of person's wish to be party to proceedings Section 274, Resource Management Act 1991 To the Registrar Environment Court Auckland Potatoes NZ Incorporated wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Appeal To The Environment Court In Respect Of Decisions On The Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1: Waikato And Waipā River Catchments: ENV 2020 AKL: 000102: FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INC. 1) Potatoes New Zealand (PNZ) is a person who has an interest in...

6. LEG-Paper-Rules-Committee-Matariki-Amendment-Rules-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 959 KB]

   Proa cti ve R ele as e 1 In confidence Office of the Associate Minister of Justice Cabinet Legislation Committee Amendments to the District Court Rules 2014, High Court Rules 2016, Court of Appeal (Criminal) Rules 2001, Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, and Court Martial Appeal Court Rules 2008. Proposal 1. I seek Cabinet’s authorisation for submission to the Executive Council of the Court Rules (Te Kāhui o Matariki Public Holiday) Amendment Rules 2022. Background 2. Th...

7. UI v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 11 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...registering his car to obtain the free 90 minutes and without paying for the 99 minutes of parking used over and above the free 90 minutes. 3. The same day UI was sent a $65.00 breach notice for exceeding the free parking period by 99 minutes. He appealed the fee however the appeal was unsuccessful. He then submitted several more appeals reiterating similar points to the original appeal, and they were all unsuccessful. 4. On 8 November T Ltd issued a further notice and added on an a...

8. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA New Zealand Starch Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...appeal below. 4. NZ Starch is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act). 5. NZ Starch received notice of the decision on 19 August 2016. 6. The parts of the decision that NZ Starch is appealing relate to: (a) Topics 006 and 035 (B7 Natural Resources and E14 Air Quality). 7. NZ Starch appeals part of the decision recorded in the Decisions of the Auckland Council on recommendations by the Auckland Unitary Plan Independ...

9. [2020] NZREADT 45 - Patel v Real Estate Agents Authority (22 September 2020) [pdf, 171 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 45 READT 029/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PRAKASH PATEL Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1902) First respondent AND MARK PHILLIPS Second respondent On the papers Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Submissions filed...

10. LM v CQ [2025] NZDT 272 (3 June 2025) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...