Otago Standards Committee v Saunderson-Warner [2013] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 231 KB]
...firm and the complainant. [10] We record that the practitioner continued to act for Mr S. This was initially intended to be on a legal aid basis but in fact ultimately was a private retainer, in which the practitioner successfully conducted an appeal. This was clearly a more involved and lengthy brief that the retainer between the firm and the complainant. [11] Finally, we note that the mistaken date (19 November rather than a later, early- December date) has been the cause of...