Search Results

1. UQ v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 251 (10 June 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

2. KS v G Ltd & D Ltd [2025] NZDT 221 (17 June 2025) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

3. Vucich & Anor v CAC306 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 172 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 54 READT 097/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN NEVILLE OWEN VUCICH AND DIANNE MERLE VUCICH on behalf of Coastal Paradise Trust Appellants (Vendors) AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (per CAC 306) First respondent AND GRAEME McLEOD ANNE-LOUISE JAMES HELENSVILLE REALTY LTD Second respondents (Licensees) MEMBERS OF TRIB...

4. Tangi v ACC [2013] NZACA 9 [pdf, 35 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON ACA 4/09 [2013] NZACA 9 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN TANIELA TANGI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Authority: Robyn Bedford Counsel: H Peart for appellant; H A Evans for respondent APPLICATION BY RESPONDENT FOR LEAVE...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 171 Genera Limited v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing : Date of Issue: Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC ' 7-1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal against four abatement notices under section 325 of the Act BETWEEN GENERA LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000152) Appellant AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s279 of the Act On the papers 14 September 2018 DECIS...

6. Vercoe v Barns - Parish of Matata 39A2A and 39A2B2B2A [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 149 (2012 APPEAL 149) [pdf, 253 KB]

   VERCOE V BARNS MAC 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 149 [29 March 2012] IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 149 (2012 APPEAL 149) A20110004678 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parish of Matata 39A2A and 39A2B2B2A BETWEEN RIHI VERCOE LAWRENCE TE AOKAHARI NIAO Appellants AND SAM BARNS & ORS 1st Respondents AND BEVERLY ADLAM 2nd Respondent AND GE...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 160 Nathan v C3 Ltd [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...judgment dated 4 January 2014, costs in respect of Mr Nee Nee’s withdrawn challenge were dealt with. 3 It was recorded in that judgment that issues of costs between C3 Ltd and Mr Nathan had been resolved between them. [4] Mr Nathan sought leave to appeal against the judgment of 20 November 2013 dismissing his challenge. Leave was granted by the Court of Appeal to Mr Nathan to appeal on a point of law. 4 In a judgment dated 4 August 2015 the Court of Appeal answered the point...

8. Fleet v Kennedy - Succession to Carol Ngawhira Tanui Fleet [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 46 (2020 APPEAL 46) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...lower Court decision is clear on its facts and results from a judicial assessment and determination of evidence that was before the appropriate decision-maker. Te Ture - The law [8] Section 55(1) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 provides: 55 Appeals to be by way of rehearing (1) Every appeal to the Māori Appellate Court shall be by way of rehearing. [9] Appeals in this Court are not hearings de novo.6 We are required to consider the evidence that was before the lower Court. W...

9. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 70 [pdf, 252 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 70 ACR 52/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOSEPH JESSUP Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Applicant is self-represented S Bisley for the respondent Judgment: 9 May 20...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 071 Box Property Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 421 KB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision [2021] NZEnvC O";/- l an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BOX PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent REYDON PLACE RESIDENTS' SOCIETY INC., COCKLE BAY RESIDENTS AND RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION INC. and HOWICK RESIDENTS AND RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION INC. Section...