14849 items matching your search terms
...COURT CX10086 PO Box 7147 Auckland Telephone: (09) 916 9091 Facsimile: (09) 916 9090 http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS An appeal against an abatement notice requiring the adoption of the best practicable option to ensure that noise levels emitted at 22 Gum Road, Henderson, do not exceed a reasonable level ENV-2025-304-000077 Hartland v Auckland Counci...
Dixon & Others v ICC – INTERIM DECISION BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 217 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Invercargill District Plan BETWEEN THOMAS ANDREW DIXON, DOUGLAS STANLEY MUNRO AND R MUNRO, JOHN DAVID SCOTT AND OAKLAND FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-097) GREGORY SIMMONS (ENV-2016-CHC-101)...
...delivered. 11. Since the formation of the Alliance I have worked as the Transport Agency’s ‘Owner Interface Manager’ within the Alliance. The key tasks for the Alliance 1 As the Court is aware, the appeals against that decision have been resolved by consent on the basis of amended conditions and a shift in the alignment of the Project (the "Northern Alignment"). The Environment Court granted the consent order of the partie...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC \ ~ °\ of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under s 120 of the Act 508 CHAPEL ROAD PARTNERSHIP TRUST (ENV-2018-AKL-000281) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Date of Correction: 2 1 NOV 2019 Date of Issue: 2 1 NOV 2019 CORRECTION Introduction [1] This appeal was against a decision by Auckl...
...is inconsistent with what is expressly recorded in the collective agreement. [69] In the field of employment law, the interpretation of collective agreements has been addressed most authoritatively and recently in the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meatworkers and Related Trades Union Inc. 6 The Court of Appeal followed the judgments of the Supreme Court in Vector Gas and what it described as a series of important decisions of the House of...
...pervasive that they affect the appearance of the Bay in its entirety: nevertheless this ‘gradient’ from more to less natural parts of the Bay remains clearly apparent. In a similar vein, the natural character values, and aesthetic cohesion and appeal, found throughout Matiatia Bay largely parallel this transition - from its mouth to its head. 12. For convenience, I reproduce below Attachment 1 to my original report, which I prepared to identify the inner and outer parts of t...
...I refer in particular to the interim decision of this Court dated 17 January 2005, the decision of the High Court in Bridgecorp Fillallce Limited v Proprietors of Mataw'i X IlIcOlporatioll [2004] 2 NZLR 792 and the decision of the Court of Appeal in BridgecOlp Fillallce Limited v Proprietors of Mataw'i X IlIcOlporatioll [2005] 3 NZLR 193. [29] The important events for the purpose of this judgment are as follows. In early July 2001 the Incorporation granted a mortgage over...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 243 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act OHAU PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-005) Appellant WAITAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner K Prime Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Oamaru on 16 and 17 October 2018 Site visi...
...Central City; (b) the Proposal would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Business 1 zone; and (c) the proposed management regime for carparking may give rise to off- site carparking effects. [4] On 17 September 2021, the Appellant appealed the Decision seeking that the resource consent be granted, subject to conditions. Mr Colin Fagg subsequently registered his interest in the appeal under s 274 of the RMA. 3 Agreement reached [5] Following direct di...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 076 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PIPERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2020-AKL-000031) WEITI HEADWATERS LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000032) Appellants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent KUMEU-HUAPAI RESIDENTS AND RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION INC Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Envir...