Search Results

1. Committee of Management of Mangatawa Papamoa Blocks Incorporation - Lot 1 DPS 65413 (2018) 164 Waikato Maniapoto MB 69 (164 WMN 69) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...rehearing, the court may affirm its former determination, or may vary or annul that determination, and may exercise any jurisdiction that it could have exercised on the original hearing. (6) When a rehearing has been granted, the period allowed for an appeal to the Maori Appellate Court shall not commence to run until the rehearing has been disposed of by a final order of the court. (7) [Repealed] Legal Principles [15] The relevant legal authorities are: (a) Henare v Māori Tr...

2. LCRO 91/2020 LS v DV (29 July 2020) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...scope of review [31] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

3. GZ v QP LCRO 226/2015 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...Review 7 [35] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:5 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

4. Alloa v Ullapool LCRO 159/09 (22 June 2010) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...favour of R, but the overall effect was that the Applicant was still able to build the deck, with some modifications. R appealed to the High Court, and the Applicant and the local council 2 cross-appealed. The High Court dismissed both appeals. The end result was that the Applicant could proceed to build his deck. [3] The Practitioner’s involvement arose in relation to a dispute between R and the vendor of the property he had purchased and the real estate agent. R ha...

5. Te Ture Whenua Maori Succession Dispute Resolution and Related Matters [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...will determine whether whāngai children have a relationship of descent in order to succeed; 4.2 limiting the life interest of a surviving spouse or partner to allow descendants to exercise voting rights earlier; and 4.3 limiting the rights of appeal in certain circumstances. BILL OF RIGHTS ASSESSMENT Whāngai – descent relationship on the basis of tikanga 5. The Act defines whāngai as “person adopted in accordance with tikanga Māori”.2 The Act provides that the Māori...

6. LCRO 47/2016 FD v QB (16 October 2018) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...scope of review [10] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

7. Rudolph - Paihia 2F2B2 [2019] Chief Judge's MB 327 (2019 CJ 327) [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...3 Ashwell - Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209 (2009 CJ 209) at [15]; and Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy - Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) at [61]. 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 335 Issues [11] The issues to determine in this case are: (a) Was the order made on 21 November 1984, vesting 28 shares in Paihia 1F2B2 in Kathleen Vivienne Rudolph, erroneous in fact or

8. LCRO 5/2017 QU v JP, YE and KJ (31 March 2017) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...scope of review [13] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

9. [2020] NZREADT 03 - AJS Rental Realty Ltd (14 February 2020) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...Complaints Assessment Committee of unsatisfactory conduct, for breaches of reg 15 of the Audit Regulations, having failed to provide monthly trust account reconciliations in time, over a period of 48 months. The Tribunal dismissed the defendant’s appeal against the Committee’s penalty orders. [c] Complaints Assessment Committee 414 v Goyal:8 The defendant was charged under s 73(c) of the Act with contravening s 134 of the Act (acquiring a client’s property without obtainin...

10. LCRO 133/2019 HM v RN (24 February 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...scope of review [21] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...