Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku 77 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...the age of 82, served as a judge of the Māori Land Court from 1984 to 1999. Among other things, he is remem- bered for making the initial decision in 1997 on Māori ownership of the fore- shore and seabed, which ultimately led to the Court of Appeal decision in Ngāti Apa in 2003 and the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. Judge Hingston presided in three Tribunal inquiries that reported their findings in the early 1990s : Ngāti Rangiteaorere (1990) ; the Māori Develop ment Corpora...

2. Emmerson - Succession to Beatrice Annie Loper [2020] Chief Judges MB 692 (2020 CJ 692) [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...section the will to which the extension related, if it had become null and void by virtue of this section, was deemed to be revived. In this case, the 16 [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167). 17 Māori Affairs Act 1953, ss 110-111; Administration Act 1952; and the Wills Act 1837 (UK). 2020 Chief Judge’s MB 708 Māori Trustee discussed applying for an extension of time with the beneficiaries of the will who...

3. Peacocke - Part Puketiti 2B 2B 1 Block and Lot 1-Deposited Plan South Auckland 33533 (2020) 205 Waikato Maniapoto MB 202 (205 WMN 202) [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...[30]. 17 Above n 13 at [36]. 18 Above n 13 at [37]. 19 Moore v Oakura F2A (2019) 2004 Taitokerau MB 64 (204 TTK 164). 20 Māori Affairs Act 1953, s 233(1). 21 Above n 19 at [19]. 205 Waikato Maniapoto MB 214 [52] That decision was appealed. In Moore – Part Oakura F2A the Māori Appellate Court agreed with the approach taken by Judge Wara, which was that the status of a block of land could not change merely by definition and a transfer to a non-Māori.22 They held t...

4. AJE, CDE, and JPS as Trustees of the EE Family Trust v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0009 [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...met. 4 [1854] 9 Exch 341 5 [1949] 2 KB 528 25 [130] The test of remoteness in tort is wider as it does not encompass the element of the contemplation of the parties. Where concurrent liability exists, as here, the English Court of Appeal considered the more confined contract test should apply.6 [131] However, if the negligence test did apply, I have concluded that it was also met. [132] Both Counsel set out the current law on causation in the negligence context in...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...coping techniques to enable her to remain in gainful employment the award for non-economic loss would have been higher.14 [50] In Gilbert, the Court awarded $75,000 for humiliation, anxiety and distress and that was not disturbed in the subsequent appeal. In that case the employee had been a probation officer exposed to unnecessary and avoidable workplace stress over many years, arising from work overload, management failure and office and resource deficiencies.15 He had suffered...

6. Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 824 KB]

   ...internal departments and/or individuals who may have access to the Information of the obligations imposed by paragraph 1 (a) above. c That the above orders continue until further order of the Tribunal, or the conclusion of the proceedings (including any appeals). [7] The grounds on which the order are sought are as follows: a The Information sought by the plaintiff relates to events occurring as early as 2011. b The Tribunal is unlikely to hear and determine the plaintiffs case before...

7. Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: Extending the duration limit of Police safety orders [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...which affects the fairness and equity of the outcomes. There is a risk of poor judgement by police officers in making a decision to issue a PSO, and for what duration. This risk has significant consequences because there is no judicial oversight/appeal right. This contrasts with Australia and United Kingdom where there are links to court processes. The proposal also provides a greater risk to the wellbeing of the victim and associated people. The removal of the bound person from the a...

8. Complaints Assessment Committee 412 v Grewal, Preet & Co Real Estate Limited, Voordouw & Mason [2018] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 314 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 47 READT 051/17 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 412 AGAINST GURPREET GREWAL First Defendant AND PREET & CO REAL ESTATE LIMITED Second Defendant AND JOSEPH VOORDOUW Third Defendant AND GARRY MASON Fourth Defendant Hearing 13 July 2018, at Auckland

9. MLC 2018 December 2018 - OCR Outstanding Applications [pdf, 445 KB]

   ...Application to the Chief Judge A20180007223 58/93 Bryce Peda Smith Nuki o Te Hapu Tahawai ki Rataroa Whanau Trust and Nga Uri o Ngati Pakahi Trust - and orders appointing trustees made at 175 Taitokerau MB 257-326 on 12 July 2018 - Notice of Appeal A20180007241 45/93 Rudolph Bangu Hotu CJ 2018/30 Sections 57, 58, 70,72 and 100 of the Ratana Pa - and orders appointing trustees at 361 Whanganui MB 75-85 on 18 November 2016 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180007358 4...

10. MLC 2019 February - OCR Outstanding Applicaitons [pdf, 371 KB]

    ...216-222 on 19 March 2015 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180008889 58/93 Riki Ngatoki, Hayward Brown Ngaiotonga A3 - and a decision to dismiss an injunction application at 181 Taitokerau MB 165-184 dated 24 September 2018.- Notice of Appeal A20180009091 45/93 Rau Trevor Brown Te Irihanga 2A Block & 6 others - and a transfer of shares made at 31 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 180-191 on 25 October 2011 - Application to the Chief Judge