Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 247 Kuku Holdings Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 226 KB]

   KUKU HOLDINGS LTD v MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL – COSTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 247 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN KUKU HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2021-CHC-104) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven sitting alone under s279 of the Act Hearing: In chambers on the papers...

2. QC & U Body Corporate v NS [2024] NZDT 760 (8 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

3. IB & MB v PX [2025] NZDT 269 (14 July 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

4. TH v D Ltd [2025] NZDT 230 (7 July 2025) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

5. ENV-2016-AKL-000200 Fengli Hou Wanshi Ryui Trust Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV-2016-AKL- of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(3) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) of Prop...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 075 Sustainable Otakiri Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...the Court's earlier decision dated 17 October 2018. 1 That decision dismissed an application by Cresswell NZ Ltd (Cresswell) to strike out the 1 Sustainable Otakiri Inc v Bay of Plenty Regional Council & ors [2018] NZEnvC 207. Otakiri appeals 2 appeal of Sustainable Otakiri Inc, and adjourned Creswell's application for security for costs against Sustainable Otakiri. The decision records that it would be premature to determine the latter application ahead of mediati...

7. LD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on appeal) [2023] NZACC 45 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 45 ACR 109/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN LD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant T Gee for the Accident Compensation Corpora...

8. Pearce v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2025] NZACC 2 (6 January 2025) [pdf, 157 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 002 ACAR 157/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANTONY PEARCE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: W Forster for the Appellant B Johns for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Jud...

9. [2020] NZREADT 01 - Leith v CAC 1903 & Cobham - Ruling (24 January 2020) [pdf, 143 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 01 READT 036/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JENNIFER LEITH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1903) First Respondent AND JULIANNE COBHAM Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submi...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 117 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Stevenson Mining Limited [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...FOREST & BIRD v WCRC & BDC & STEVENSON MINING – STAY IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 117 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2017-CHC-090) Appellant AND WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL AND BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondents AND STEVENSON MINING LIMIT...