Search Results

1. JQ v QM LCRO 97 / 2011 (28 August 2012) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...intimidating or inappropriate. It was claimed that the Practitioner was ringing in his personal capacity as a defendant, not in his professional capacity as a lawyer. Counsel submitted that in these circumstances the Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008 (“the Rules”) did not apply. [7] In the course of the Standards Committee enquiry the Practitioner was asked to specifically address whether or not the test of misconduct set out in section 7(1)(b)(ii) applied to him. T...

2. 2022-03-02 Hearing Notice - PC8 (Urban Provisions) - Commencing Monday 21 March 2022 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Au...

3. [2021] NZACC 79 Erwood v ACC (26 May 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...forensic psychiatrist dated 17/11/2020, that I should not enter into litigation prior to his assessment of me. Despite this the Court has ignored this, this letter was filed with the Tribunal. As a incapacitated person, the Tribunal requires I be protected, as a matter of law. I was not served with the other party’s submissions, I was not advised of the hearing date even. The Tribunal could not proceed with any hearing, having been put on notice by the Court’s forensic...

4. 2021-10-15 PC8 - Hearing Notice [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

5. 2022-03-02 Hearing Notice - PC8 (Urban Provisions) - Commencing Monday 21 March 2022 - updated [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

6. 2022-03-01 PC8 (Urban) Hearing Notice - further updated [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

7. Tonks v Stone [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...to be correctly flashed with matching profile roofing material. All the very awkward flashing of rounded junctions between walls and roofs and skylights and the like need to be flashed by an experienced plumber as considerable thought and care is required to ensure weathertightness at these difficult points. Conventional flashing materials will not be able to effect weathertightness due to the curved shapes of the walls and roof skylight and the trapedoizial-section roofing....

8. [2022] NZIACDT 10 - BC v Lawlor (18 May 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...bundle of support documents. It concerned Mr Lawlor’s work for the father. The following heads of complaint against him are referred to the Tribunal: Negligence, or alternatively breach of the specified provisions of the Code (1) Failure to take care filing a PGVV for the father when he was not eligible, in breach of cl 1. (2) Failure to file a s 61 request in a timely manner and failure to acknowledge his role in the delay, in breach of cl 1. (3) Failure to have a written agr...

9. DA v EB LCRO 7/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...paid it into a trust account, as she has since accepted she should have done. By thwarting the operation of Regulation 9, Ms DA cannot be said to have breached it. While that is a logical outcome, it is not satisfactory in that it side-steps the protections Regulation 9 provides to lawyers’ clients. [77] The Committee was also correct to find that Ms DA had breached Regulation 10, which makes provision for fees and disbursements to be paid in advance of a practitioner renderin...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...Immigration NZ to Mr McCarthy on 6 succeeded only once, speaking to him on 14 October 2021. He told the officer he would reply to their emails that day, but he did not do so. [32] On 4 November 2021, Immigration NZ wrote to the complainant, care of Mr McCarthy, stating that the mandatory character information was missing. The government agency said it had sought to contact Mr McCarthy numerous times between 23 July and 28 October 2021, but he did not respond. They were given...