SU v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 142 (14 February 2025) [pdf, 100 KB]
...further leaks, and various other issues. The parties could not agree on the extent of the remedial work needed. The consumer now claims $19,309.97 in damages from the supplier. 4. The issues to be determined are: a) Was the work done with reasonable care and skill and was it fit for the purpose? b) What sum, if any, is payable? Was the work done with reasonable care and skill and was it fit for the purpose? 5. Section 28 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) provides that where s...