Canterbury Standards Committee v Sisson [2011] NZLCDT 35 [pdf, 143 KB]
...recognises that she needs intense psychological therapy and is unable to cope with 5 practice at the present time. Obtaining such professional assistance could have been viewed as a step towards rehabilitation that was a mitigating or protective step, but once again Ms Sisson failed to approach it in a proper or timely way and her refusal to show us the report meant no reliance could be placed upon it. Ms Sisson sought a period of suspension rather than strike off. She pro...