CAC 414 & 416 v Tafilipepe [2019 ] NZREADT 13 (10 May 2019) [pdf, 332 KB]
...“marketing to the public”, such as signage placed on a property and advertisements in the media. He submitted that such an interpretation is unduly restrictive, and ignores the intent of r 9.6, which is to ensure that vendor clients have the protection of a listing agreement before any action is taken towards selling their property. [49] In the present case, he submitted, [ ] was given the address of the property, and the information contained in the Scope of Works. Furt...